From: "Steve Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 05:29:01PM -0500, Matt Yackley is rumored to have
said:
> >
> > Rick Macdougall said:
> > > http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/05/sexexplicit.htm
> > >
> > >
> > First rule post! oops, wrong forum :)
> >
> > Just because its not illegal to send them, doesn't mean we have to
accept
> > them.... ;)
> >
> > header SUBJ_CANSPAM_SE Subject =~ /SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT/
> > describe SUBJ_CANSPAM_SE Contains CAN-SPAM "adult" tag
> > score SUBJ_CANSPAM_SE 2.000
> > # Score to taste
>
> Might want to make that case-insensitive. I've already received one of
these and the 'sexually-explicit' was all lower case. I've set up a procmail
rule to file these in a separate folder.
>
Ah, your private stash! You Dirty Old Man!
{^_-} (I bet everybody thinks "jdow" is my first initial and last name.
It's really "Jolly Dirty Old Woman." {O,o})
