"It's worse." (Han Solo, "Star Wars") If I block the 'bad' IP addresses being returned by spammer DNS in my firewall, postfix still sees it as 'no route'. So it's not a solution. I realize the problem is occurring in postfix, before SA gets involved, but if anyone has hit and fixed this 'DNS' problem, I'd appreciate some pointers. I need to have DNS 'recognize' when a spammer DNS returns 'reserved' (10.0.0.0 et al) IP's, and have it tell postfix 'no host'.
- Charles On Fri, 21 May 2004, Charles Gregory wrote: > HELP! > > I just looked through my mail logs, after getting a complaint about > slowness, and I am seeing a fair number of *outbound* mails, that are > obviously 'user not found' types of bounces from spam, and they are all > hitting 'NO ROUTE TO HOST' - which is a 'deferred' condition in postfix, > rather than a drop/reject. Some of the IP's are clearly LAN reserved > IP's. Like 'mail.doreg.com' started out as 192.168.0.1 and now returns > 10.10.10.10. > > I can block those obvious 'invalid' IP's for port 25 in my firewall, but I > was wondering if there is a more generic solution, DNS based, perhaps? > > - Charles > > > On Thu, 20 May 2004, Lucas Albers wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:29:19 -0600 (MDT) > > From: Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [spa] scan but not learn from > > > > How to run SA on an email message and assign a spam score, but > > irrespective of the score, don't learn bayes or awl from it. > > Any idea? > > > > I have some junky newsletters I want to whitelist but I don't want to kill > > by bayes database by learning it as ham. > > > > -- > > Luke Computer Science System Administrator > > Security Administrator,College of Engineering > > Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana > > >
