Also note that Habeas has a free individual license for non-commercial users.
http://www.habeas.com/servicesLicensingOptions.html The delays and bandwidth usage are in the noise, while avoiding a false positive (including from ISPs and other anti-spam solutions in addition to SpamAssassin) can be quite valuable. - dan -- Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600> -----Original Message----- From: Dimitrios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Habeas crap On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:10:02 -0700 "Des Cahill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Use of this patch, or the installation of SA 3.0.x will prevent spammers > from forging Habeas mark, yet still allow delivery of legitimate mail. To tell the truth, i'm a little reluctant towards commercial sevices like the ones you offer. The habeas service seems to be specific to people who pay for your services, and it is not a generic score test within SA that can be applied to all emails. In addition, appart from people in this mailing list, its not a widely accepted system, thus we are not missing anything by not using it. So, for 3,000 email addresses, of which none are customers of habeas, and none of them receive any emails marked by habeas (appart from spam). So why would we want to add extra delays and bandwidth useage, in order to use the Habeas whitelist?
