John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 04 August 2004 08:00 am, Daulton, Douglas wrote:
> > and our list management product (Lyris) uses SA as a tool > > for helping us understand the "spaminess" of our > > correspondence. > > And why should that be necessary on a "double Opt In List" > as you claimed in your original post???? I'm also suspicious of people who use the phrase "double opt in", but I don't see why it has anything to do with whether it's necessary to adjust language to avoid triggering SA rules. Plenty of senders of legitimate newsletters use SA for such testing (and of course lots of spammers do too). The fact that someone has gone through a confirmed signup process to get onto a list won't do anything to keep SA from identifying the messages as spam. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
