At 23:50 23/05/02 +0200, Alfredo G�mez Grande wrote:
>And about your comments: Anybody is going to scrawl your house with
>graffiti.

[I have assumed you meant "nobody is going to scrawl your house with graffiti].

In fact lots of people get their houses scrawled with graffiti, 
particularly in large urban areas.

>You can defend your property, even with weapons (only US).

This assumes you're there to do it. Graffitists like to strike when 
nobody's around.

>But we
>are talking about mailboxes so let's don't go beyond the limits of the
>Reality.

People pay for their houses. People pay for their electronic mailboxes.

Many houses use external materials designed to be painted. Electronic 
mailboxes are designed to receive electronic Mail.

The fact that the outside of a house is designed to be painted does not 
mean that spray-painted graffiti is permitted. The fact that electronic 
mailboxes are designed to receive electronic mail does not mean that spam 
is permitted.

Graffiti is something done to the house that is against the wishes of the 
owner. Spam is something done to electronic mailboxes that is against the 
wishes of the owner.

Graffiti costs time and money to clean off the walls. Spam costs time and 
money to clean out of the mailbox

Graffiti contains a message. Spam contains a message.

Graffiti is a use of the possessions of others to the benefit of its 
perpetrator. Spam is a use of the possessions of others to the benefit of 
the perpetrator.

You appear to have started from the position that an electronic mailbox is 
nothing of value. But people pay for electronic mailboxes. Many people 
(including me) pay for *specific* electronic mailboxes that relate to their 
name. If people are paying money for these things, they are quite clearly 
something of value.

You also appear to assume that because electronic mailboxes are merely 
represented by bits and bytes in computers, there is no harm done to the 
recipient by something that alters those bits and bytes. In fact the entire 
purpose of a computer is to alter bits and bytes and produce output based 
on them. This is the source of all their value. A computer that cannot 
manipulate its bits and bytes is worthless. People pay thousands of dollars 
for physical hardware, merely to get the bits and bytes and the 
manipulations of bits and bytes. Clearly the bits and bytes, and the 
configuration of those bits and bytes, are of value to the owner.

If the mailbox, and the bits and bytes, are of value to the owner when they 
are used in accordance with the owners wishes, then use of the mailbox or 
the bits and bytes in contradiction to the owners wishes is necessarily of 
negative value to the owner - that is, harmful to them.
______________________________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          IANALY,TINLA              Troy Rollo, Sydney, Australia
       Fight spam in Australia - Join CAUBE.AU - http://www.caube.org.au/


_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
    of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to