on 5/28/02 2:19 PM, B0b Jay at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Also - anyone who writes to their elected representives.. Please write to your > senator(s) and tell them to vote NO on S630. > Quote from this bill >>> (3) Unsolicited commercial electronic mail can be a >>mechanism through >>> which businesses advertise >>> and attract customers in the online environment. > Bad Law, VERY BAD LAW.
Cute. Might even be true. But you might engender a little more support if you explained why it's a bad law. And explained what people should be complaining about. In my experience, you tend to get farther if you expound a bit on why you think they should vote against something... I have not read the entire bill yet, although I will, but the following paragraph stands out: (a) IN GENERAL- Any person who intentionally initiates the transmission of any unsolicited commercial electronic mail message to a protected computer in the United States with knowledge that such message contains or is accompanied by header information that is materially or intentionally false or misleading shall be fined or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both, under this title. That should get somebody's attention. Dale _______________________________________________ spamcon-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
