Dear All,

            When I run the TPP pipeline with downloaded version of the
development prerelease of TPP dated 22-04-2010, I am getting 0 hits
whereas when I run pipeline with release version of TPP (TPP v4.3
(jetstream)  rev 1) for the same data and parameters, I am getting 822
hits.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Here is the STDOUT when I run the TPP pipeline with
development version downloaded on 22-04-2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/home/APCF/tpp/bin/xinteract (TPP v4.4 JETSTREAM (unstable development
prerelease) rev 0, Build 201006041141 (linux))

running: "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/bin/InteractParser 'jagan-
J78.pepprophet.xml' 'jagan-J78.pep.xml' -L'7'"

file 1: jagan-J78.pep.xml

processed altogether 3429 results

results written to file /mnt/sanfs/APCF/results/tpp/2010-06-23/jagan-
J78.pepprophet.shtml

command completed in 1 sec

running: "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/bin/PeptideProphetParser 'jagan-
J78.pepprophet.xml' MINPROB=0.05 EXTRAITRS=20"

(X! Tandem (k-score))

init with X! Tandem (k-score) trypsin

MS Instrument info: Manufacturer: Thermo Scientific, Model: LTQ
Orbitrap, Ionization: nanoelectrospray, Analyzer: orbitrap, Detector:
inductive detector

Initialising statistical models ...

Iterations: .........10.........20........

model complete after 29 iterations

command completed in 0 sec

running: "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/bin/ProphetModels.pl -i jagan-
J78.pepprophet.xml"

Analyzing jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml ...

Parsing search results "jagan-J77 (X! Tandem (k-score))"...

=> Total of 0 hits.

command completed in 0 sec

running: "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/bin/DatabaseParser 'jagan-
J78.pepprophet.xml'"

command completed in 0 sec

running: "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/bin/RefreshParser 'jagan-
J78.pepprophet.xml' '/home/APCF/databases/SwissProt/
uniprot_sprot.fasta'"

- Searching the tree...

- Linking duplicate entries... - Printing results...

command completed in 3 sec

running: "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/cgi-bin/PepXMLViewer.cgi -I /
mnt/sanfs/APCF/results/tpp/2010-06-23/jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml"

command "/mnt/sanfs/APCF/APCF_WEB/tpp/cgi-bin/PepXMLViewer.cgi -I /mnt/
sanfs/APCF/results/tpp/2010-06-23/jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml" exited
with non-zero exit code: 11

QUIT - the job is incomplete

ProteinProphet (C++) by Insilicos LLC and LabKey Software, after the
original Perl by A. Keller (TPP v4.4 JETSTREAM (unstable development
prerelease) rev 0, Build 201006041141 (linux))

(xml input) (report Protein Length) (using degen pep info)

. . . reading in /mnt/sanfs/APCF/results/tpp/2010-06-23/jagan-
J78.pepprophet.xml. . .

did not find any PeptideProphet results in input data! Did you forget
to run PeptideProphet?

. . . read in 0 1+, 0 2+, 0 3+, 0 4+, 0 5+, 0 6+, 0 7+ spectra with
min prob 0.05

no data - quitting
==============================================================================
But when I run the same thing with release version of TPP (TPP v4.3
(jetstream) rev 1) everything  went OK.
Here is the STDOUT message ....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# pwd
/mnt/sanfs/APCF/results/tpp/2010-06-23/temp
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# ls
jagan-J77.mzXML  jagan-J77.xml
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# /share/apps/TPP431/trans_proteomic_pipeline/
build/linux/Tandem2XML jagan-J77.xml jagan-J78.pep.xml
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# /share/apps/TPP431/trans_proteomic_pipeline/
build/linux/InteractParser jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml jagan-J78.pep.xml -
L7
 file 1: jagan-J78.pep.xml
 processed altogether 3429 results

 results written to file /mnt/sanfs/APCF/results/tpp/2010-06-23/temp/
jagan-J78.pepprophet.shtml

[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# /share/apps/TPP431/trans_proteomic_pipeline/
build/linux/PeptideProphetParser jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml MINPROB=0.05
EXTRAITRS=20
 (X! Tandem (k-score))
init with X! Tandem (k-score) trypsin
MS Instrument info: Manufacturer: Thermo Scientific, Model: LTQ
Orbitrap, Ionization: nanoelectrospray, Analyzer: orbitrap, Detector:
inductive detector

 PeptideProphet  (TPP v4.3 JETSTREAM rev 1, Build 201003241044
(linux)) akel...@isb
 read in 1127 1+, 1355 2+, 361 3+, 54 4+, 0 5+, 0 6+, and 0 7+
spectra.
Initialising statistical models ...
negmean = -0.490485
negmean = -0.0225753
negmean = -0.520051
negmean = 0.801738
negmean = -0.2
negmean = -0.2
negmean = -0.2
Iterations: .........10.........20........
WARNING: Mixture model quality test failed for charge (1+).
model complete after 29 iterations
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# /share/apps/TPP431/trans_proteomic_pipeline/
build/linux/ProphetModels.pl -i jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml
Analyzing jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml ...
Parsing search results "jagan-J77 (X! Tandem (k-score))"...
  => Total of 822 hits.
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# /share/apps/TPP431/trans_proteomic_pipeline/
build/linux/DatabaseParser jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml
/home/APCF/databases/SwissProt/uniprot_sprot.fasta
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]# /share/apps/TPP431/trans_proteomic_pipeline/
build/linux/RefreshParser jagan-J78.pepprophet.xml /home/APCF/
databases/SwissProt/uniprot_sprot.fasta
  - Building Commentz-Walter keyword tree...  - Searching the tree...
  - Linking duplicate entries...  - Printing results...
[r...@compute-3-0 temp]#
==============================================================================

I wonder whether there is any quick fix to this problem. Something
broken from the release version to development version.

with regards,

Jagan Kommineni




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to