Aah. No, there were no msLevel=2 entries, while in all the other files
there are ones that are searched by Tandem.
I am quite new to this--does that mean that for this particular file
the actual experiment was not run as tandem ms?

Thanks,
Tom

On Jul 20, 10:17 am, Jimmy Eng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Look for or do a string search for the text:  msLevel="2"
>
> These are the ms/ms scans that would be searched by Tandem.
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, tommyg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> > The mzXML file is about 290 mb and has many scan entries that look
> > like other mzXML scan entries from files that I was able to run. There
> > are 19517 scans in this particular file. I copied an example of a scan
> > entry. Is there something else I should look for to confirm there are
> > ms/ms scans?
>
> >    <scan num="19517"
> >          scanEvent="1"
> >          scanType="FULL"
> >          centroided="1"
> >          msLevel="1"
> >          peaksCount="56"
> >          polarity="+"
> >          retentionTime="PT3000S"
> >          lowMz="400.1986083984375"
> >          highMz="1122.22021484375"
> >          basePeakMz="444.97515869140625"
> >          basePeakIntensity="1593.150634765625"
> >          totIonCurrent="16308.9521484375"
> >          msInstrumentID="IC1">
> >      <peaks precision="64"
> >             byteOrder="network"
> >             pairOrder="m/z-
> > int">QHkDLYAAAABAUJxTgAAAAEB5RSjAAAAAQGgNbsAAAABAeVGLoAAAAEB1MZpAAAAAQHlmL4AAAABAezhpwAAAAEB5diBAAAAAQE60nWAAAABAeYODYAAAAEBiiDRAAAAAQHm7j2AAAABAdWpfQAAAAEB50oBgAAAAQFo8CIAAAABAegAA4AAAAEBjqfxAAAAAQHowO
> > +AAAABAfEVDIAAAAEB6Qa3AAAAAQFgOiSAAAABAemQ34AAAAEBkuQYAAAAAQHpzaUAAAABAU7N4YAAAAEB6nILgAAAAQF6QP4AAAABAez3lAAAAAEBRiknAAAAAQHttS4AAAABAWkAfwAAAAEB7tBXgAAAAQFxqm8AAAABAe8+aQAAAAECY5JpAAAAAQHvfvWAAAABAgTuT4AAAAEB78M8AAAAAQJiPG0AAAABAfADHQAAAAEB491fAAAAAQHwTYeAAAABAUaiuIAAAAEB8vkUgAAAAQGXQEWAAAABAfMjToAAAAEBhcqpgAAAAQHzfGmAAAABAd
> > +U1QAAAAEB9T6RAAAAAQFgN/
> > YAAAABAfbTBgAAAAEBm8pugAAAAQH3jvCAAAABAU7bDoAAAAEB/
> > jrbAAAAAQFpBIkAAAABAf6+sQAAAAEBTt3CAAAAAQIA3s
> > +AAAABAlC9QwAAAAECAP4jAAAAAQJGW5eAAAABAgEc8AAAAAEBtaqVAAAAAQIBPsIAAAABAY6MpQAAAAECAqPwgAAAAQFgB0KAAAABAgoZ2QAAAAECJzGQgAAAAQIKPLgAAAABAgZ/
> > ZIAAAAECClyrAAAAAQHzKF2AAAABAgp9D4AAAAEBaPRcAAAAAQIMX/
> > kAAAABAWFEIIAAAAECE0teAAAAAQHZgxqAAAABAhOFzgAAAAEBusFlAAAAAQITnvYAAAABAaieu4AAAAECE9cWAAAAAQFXg6mAAAABAhx2egAAAAEBV2+iAAAAAQIcmRYAAAABAhJ9RoAAAAECHLfDAAAAAQGoudEAAAABAh0UUoAAAAEBWAzyAAAAAQIdbKcAAAABAWjoogAAAAECJdC4AAAAAQHQtpoAAAABAiYTRwAAAAEBaPJSgAAAAQImdxoAAAABAVeIAYAAAAECKFzbAAAAAQEpqGOAAAABAi9YBoAAAAEBRuA3AAAAAQJA/
> > PiAAAABAWjof4AAAAECRiOGAAAAAQFO1l8AAAAA=</peaks>
> >    </scan>
>
> > On Jul 20, 9:53 am, Jimmy Eng <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Tom, possible there are no ms/ms scans in this raw file?
>
> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:01 PM, tommyg <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
>
> >> > I'm getting a "No input spectra met the acceptance criteria" error
> >> > while running the latest version of X!Tandem on a 64-bit Intel(R)
> >> > Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E6550  @ 2.33GHz running Fedora 11.
>
> >> > I've successfully run many other .pkl files, but for this
> >> > particular .RAW file (D2.raw), I was not able to convert it to a .pkl.
> >> > I was able to convert it to D2.mzXML or D2.mzML file using TPP/
> >> > msconvert, but still getting the error when running XTandem on these
> >> > files. Additionally, I cannot convert the mzXML to pkl (or any other
> >> > format) using MzXML2Search.
>
> >> > I was able to convert other .raw files to mzXML, and then to pkl, and
> >> > I was able to run these files successfully on XTandem. So this is
> >> > specific to this one particular D2.raw/D2.mzXML file.It appears that
> >> > there are spectra. Any ideas?
> >> > I can upload the mzXML file if it would help.
>
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Tom
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > [email protected].
> >> > For more options, visit this group 
> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "spctools-discuss" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to