"Yes" to your question.

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, tommyg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aah. No, there were no msLevel=2 entries, while in all the other files
> there are ones that are searched by Tandem.
> I am quite new to this--does that mean that for this particular file
> the actual experiment was not run as tandem ms?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> On Jul 20, 10:17 am, Jimmy Eng <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Look for or do a string search for the text:  msLevel="2"
>>
>> These are the ms/ms scans that would be searched by Tandem.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, tommyg <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Jim,
>> > The mzXML file is about 290 mb and has many scan entries that look
>> > like other mzXML scan entries from files that I was able to run. There
>> > are 19517 scans in this particular file. I copied an example of a scan
>> > entry. Is there something else I should look for to confirm there are
>> > ms/ms scans?
>>
>> >    <scan num="19517"
>> >          scanEvent="1"
>> >          scanType="FULL"
>> >          centroided="1"
>> >          msLevel="1"
>> >          peaksCount="56"
>> >          polarity="+"
>> >          retentionTime="PT3000S"
>> >          lowMz="400.1986083984375"
>> >          highMz="1122.22021484375"
>> >          basePeakMz="444.97515869140625"
>> >          basePeakIntensity="1593.150634765625"
>> >          totIonCurrent="16308.9521484375"
>> >          msInstrumentID="IC1">
>> >      <peaks precision="64"
>> >             byteOrder="network"
>> >             pairOrder="m/z-
>> > int">QHkDLYAAAABAUJxTgAAAAEB5RSjAAAAAQGgNbsAAAABAeVGLoAAAAEB1MZpAAAAAQHlmL4AAAABAezhpwAAAAEB5diBAAAAAQE60nWAAAABAeYODYAAAAEBiiDRAAAAAQHm7j2AAAABAdWpfQAAAAEB50oBgAAAAQFo8CIAAAABAegAA4AAAAEBjqfxAAAAAQHowO
>> > +AAAABAfEVDIAAAAEB6Qa3AAAAAQFgOiSAAAABAemQ34AAAAEBkuQYAAAAAQHpzaUAAAABAU7N4YAAAAEB6nILgAAAAQF6QP4AAAABAez3lAAAAAEBRiknAAAAAQHttS4AAAABAWkAfwAAAAEB7tBXgAAAAQFxqm8AAAABAe8+aQAAAAECY5JpAAAAAQHvfvWAAAABAgTuT4AAAAEB78M8AAAAAQJiPG0AAAABAfADHQAAAAEB491fAAAAAQHwTYeAAAABAUaiuIAAAAEB8vkUgAAAAQGXQEWAAAABAfMjToAAAAEBhcqpgAAAAQHzfGmAAAABAd
>> > +U1QAAAAEB9T6RAAAAAQFgN/
>> > YAAAABAfbTBgAAAAEBm8pugAAAAQH3jvCAAAABAU7bDoAAAAEB/
>> > jrbAAAAAQFpBIkAAAABAf6+sQAAAAEBTt3CAAAAAQIA3s
>> > +AAAABAlC9QwAAAAECAP4jAAAAAQJGW5eAAAABAgEc8AAAAAEBtaqVAAAAAQIBPsIAAAABAY6MpQAAAAECAqPwgAAAAQFgB0KAAAABAgoZ2QAAAAECJzGQgAAAAQIKPLgAAAABAgZ/
>> > ZIAAAAECClyrAAAAAQHzKF2AAAABAgp9D4AAAAEBaPRcAAAAAQIMX/
>> > kAAAABAWFEIIAAAAECE0teAAAAAQHZgxqAAAABAhOFzgAAAAEBusFlAAAAAQITnvYAAAABAaieu4AAAAECE9cWAAAAAQFXg6mAAAABAhx2egAAAAEBV2+iAAAAAQIcmRYAAAABAhJ9RoAAAAECHLfDAAAAAQGoudEAAAABAh0UUoAAAAEBWAzyAAAAAQIdbKcAAAABAWjoogAAAAECJdC4AAAAAQHQtpoAAAABAiYTRwAAAAEBaPJSgAAAAQImdxoAAAABAVeIAYAAAAECKFzbAAAAAQEpqGOAAAABAi9YBoAAAAEBRuA3AAAAAQJA/
>> > PiAAAABAWjof4AAAAECRiOGAAAAAQFO1l8AAAAA=</peaks>
>> >    </scan>
>>
>> > On Jul 20, 9:53 am, Jimmy Eng <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Tom, possible there are no ms/ms scans in this raw file?
>>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:01 PM, tommyg <[email protected]> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>>
>> >> > I'm getting a "No input spectra met the acceptance criteria" error
>> >> > while running the latest version of X!Tandem on a 64-bit Intel(R)
>> >> > Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E6550  @ 2.33GHz running Fedora 11.
>>
>> >> > I've successfully run many other .pkl files, but for this
>> >> > particular .RAW file (D2.raw), I was not able to convert it to a .pkl.
>> >> > I was able to convert it to D2.mzXML or D2.mzML file using TPP/
>> >> > msconvert, but still getting the error when running XTandem on these
>> >> > files. Additionally, I cannot convert the mzXML to pkl (or any other
>> >> > format) using MzXML2Search.
>>
>> >> > I was able to convert other .raw files to mzXML, and then to pkl, and
>> >> > I was able to run these files successfully on XTandem. So this is
>> >> > specific to this one particular D2.raw/D2.mzXML file.It appears that
>> >> > there are spectra. Any ideas?
>> >> > I can upload the mzXML file if it would help.
>>
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Tom
>>
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> > Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> >> > [email protected].
>> >> > For more options, visit this group 
>> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "spctools-discuss" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group 
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to