Nice! I did a lengthy check as well just to be sure and found the same thing, including msconvert MzXMLs as well. Unfortunately, I wasn't here when we set our wine readw system up so I don't really know what went into it.
On Nov 5, 1:29 pm, dctrud <[email protected]> wrote: > Just read this post and though I'd check our wine ReAdW output vs > native XP using diff. Like Jeffrey we're using Trapper and ReAdW on > Ubuntu (10.04 LTS), wine version 1.2. Were previously using it on > Ubuntu 9.04 for over a year, with whatever version of wine that had. > Never had any problems using the MzXMLs converted through wine, and > it's *very* nice to be able to do it on a fast server directly > connected to the main data storage array rather than on a windows > desktop. > > sha1 hashes for the files are different, but diff shows that the only > differences are: > > 1) parentFile tag has a different filename attribute (since the .RAW > is in a different place) > 2) all of the <offset> values are sightly different, because the > parentFile filename attribute is a few bytes different > 3) <indexOffset> is different (again due to the filename difference) > 4) <sha1> is different due to the above differences between the files. > > Other than this the wine version and windows version of the mzXML are > identical. No differences at all in any of the markup or encoded > spectra other than for the tags listed above. > > Cheers, > > DT > > On Oct 14, 11:47 pm, Natalie Tasman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Have you done comparisons between mzXML output from your WINE > > installation and a native Windows environment? I would expect that > > there will be some subtle but important differences between the two. > > Like I've said before on this list, and as Matt stated on this thread, > > if you have this working 100% completely it's the first time it's been > > reported. Nice job if so. > > > -Natalie > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jeffrey Milloy > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > XCalibur and ReAdW have been running in wine for more than two years > > > now, through several ubuntu upgrades and wine updates. Seems totally > > > stable, although now I'm hesitant to update XCalibur and ReADdW to > > > current versions! This is one reason why I figure this is a reasonably > > > route for adding my own functionality. > > > > On Oct 14, 2:06 pm, Matthew Chambers <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> I wouldn't recommend getting your hopes up on using XRawfile (a COM > > >> interface to an MFC library) with Wine. I have not heard of anyone able > > >> to do this and > > >> reproduce it reliably on other machines. It may only work with a narrow > > >> set of Wine versions, kernel version, x86 emulation, etc. Your time > > >> would probably be > > >> better spent creating a true Windows VM to do this. On the other hand, > > >> if anybody is able to do this reliably and I just haven't heard about > > >> it, I sure would > > >> like to know. > > > >> -Matt > > > >> On 10/14/2010 12:56 PM, Jeffrey Milloy wrote: > > > >> > I'm having a hard time building tpp. My interest in the tpp source is > > >> > in reading XRawfile metadata using c++. If anyone has a different > > >> > suggestion for using the XRawfile2 DLL with c++ I would be grateful. > > >> > C# won't work for me because I want to run the code in wine/mono and > > >> > CSLID is not supported in mono. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "spctools-discuss" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
