I just tried readw on wine for the very first time this afternoon (version 1.2.1 on a RHEL 5.5 box); I'm impressed with how easy it was to setup. Both very old LCQ and new Orbi RAW files generated mzXML's that were *exactly* the same between wine and native Windows conversions. 'diff' returned no differences so scan offset indices and checksums were exact matches too.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jeffrey Milloy <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice! I did a lengthy check as well just to be sure and found the same > thing, including msconvert MzXMLs as well. Unfortunately, I wasn't > here when we set our wine readw system up so I don't really know what > went into it. > > On Nov 5, 1:29 pm, dctrud <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just read this post and though I'd check our wine ReAdW output vs >> native XP using diff. Like Jeffrey we're using Trapper and ReAdW on >> Ubuntu (10.04 LTS), wine version 1.2. Were previously using it on >> Ubuntu 9.04 for over a year, with whatever version of wine that had. >> Never had any problems using the MzXMLs converted through wine, and >> it's *very* nice to be able to do it on a fast server directly >> connected to the main data storage array rather than on a windows >> desktop. >> >> sha1 hashes for the files are different, but diff shows that the only >> differences are: >> >> 1) parentFile tag has a different filename attribute (since the .RAW >> is in a different place) >> 2) all of the <offset> values are sightly different, because the >> parentFile filename attribute is a few bytes different >> 3) <indexOffset> is different (again due to the filename difference) >> 4) <sha1> is different due to the above differences between the files. >> >> Other than this the wine version and windows version of the mzXML are >> identical. No differences at all in any of the markup or encoded >> spectra other than for the tags listed above. >> >> Cheers, >> >> DT >> >> On Oct 14, 11:47 pm, Natalie Tasman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Have you done comparisons between mzXML output from your WINE >> > installation and a native Windows environment? I would expect that >> > there will be some subtle but important differences between the two. >> > Like I've said before on this list, and as Matt stated on this thread, >> > if you have this working 100% completely it's the first time it's been >> > reported. Nice job if so. >> >> > -Natalie >> >> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jeffrey Milloy >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > XCalibur and ReAdW have been running in wine for more than two years >> > > now, through several ubuntu upgrades and wine updates. Seems totally >> > > stable, although now I'm hesitant to update XCalibur and ReADdW to >> > > current versions! This is one reason why I figure this is a reasonably >> > > route for adding my own functionality. >> >> > > On Oct 14, 2:06 pm, Matthew Chambers <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> I wouldn't recommend getting your hopes up on using XRawfile (a COM >> > >> interface to an MFC library) with Wine. I have not heard of anyone able >> > >> to do this and >> > >> reproduce it reliably on other machines. It may only work with a narrow >> > >> set of Wine versions, kernel version, x86 emulation, etc. Your time >> > >> would probably be >> > >> better spent creating a true Windows VM to do this. On the other hand, >> > >> if anybody is able to do this reliably and I just haven't heard about >> > >> it, I sure would >> > >> like to know. >> >> > >> -Matt >> >> > >> On 10/14/2010 12:56 PM, Jeffrey Milloy wrote: >> >> > >> > I'm having a hard time building tpp. My interest in the tpp source is >> > >> > in reading XRawfile metadata using c++. If anyone has a different >> > >> > suggestion for using the XRawfile2 DLL with c++ I would be grateful. >> > >> > C# won't work for me because I want to run the code in wine/mono and >> > >> > CSLID is not supported in mono. >> >> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > Groups "spctools-discuss" group. >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > [email protected]. >> > > For more options, visit this group >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spctools-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
