Hi Luis,

Yes, about one quarter of them have prob <0.5 but for the other ones with 
prob and iprob >0.5 I'm not sure why I'm not seeing this in the 
quantitation.tsv...

Best,

Adam

On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 3:48:16 PM UTC-6, Luis wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Hard to tell exactly without looking at your file.  One thing to note is 
> that Libra will only use psm's with PeptideProphet probabilities > 0.5; it 
> does not take into account iProphet probabilities (yet).  Maybe this 
> explains some of the ones that are missing?
>
> Cheers,
> --Luis
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Adam R <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> I just took a look at the quantitation.tsv file. Interestingly enough for 
>> the protein I am looking at there is only one peptide listed in this table, 
>> however, when looking at the ipro.pep.xml file for peptides of this protein 
>> I have eleven of them, all with ipro > 0.99 and some with intensities of 0 
>> in the competitive inhibitor-treated channel...not sure what to make of 
>> this. Other proteins are listed with peptides and have the yes/no indicator 
>> for "kept?" and show intensities, in some cases zero... Are there other 
>> parameters that are preventing these peptides from showing up in the 
>> quantitation.tsv file?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 2:58:08 PM UTC-6, Luis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I forgot to add that once the protein quantitation is done, Libra will 
>>> also produce a "quantitation.tsv" file that you can use downstream for 
>>> re-evaluating protein ratios with any statistical(s) test you wish -- say 
>>> in R, Excel, etc.  The file structure is fairly straightforward: protein 
>>> ratios and errors, followed by those of its peptides, including adjusted 
>>> intensities and a kept flag (used/not used in quant).
>>>
>>> ---Luis
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Adam R <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Luis for the response!
>>>>
>>>> Adam
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-6, Luis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have plans to add some of these features to Libra as well as 
>>>>> others, but none are ready at the moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> One thing you could try is to select to normalize against the sum of 
>>>>> the reagent profiles (instead of selecting a channel to quantify against) 
>>>>> -- this should give you a value for all channels, even when some are 
>>>>> missing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> --Luis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Adam R <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a way to retain quantified peptides for the protein quant 
>>>>>> with Libra? I understand that Libra discards peptides without all 
>>>>>> channels...what about in instances where the you expect there to be 
>>>>>> little 
>>>>>> or no intensity? I have data from pulldowns where we don't expect to see 
>>>>>> much of the protein in the presence of a competitive inhibitor, so in 
>>>>>> this 
>>>>>> case it would be of use to retain such quants where the intensity is 
>>>>>> zero 
>>>>>> in the presence of inhibitor but several thousands in the pulldown 
>>>>>> channel...Is there a way to toggle on/off the peptides that are used for 
>>>>>> the protein quant in Libra? I'm thinking along the lines like in Xpress 
>>>>>> where you can toggle whether or not a peptide is used for the protein 
>>>>>> quant. Is there also a way to modify the number of standard deviations 
>>>>>> that 
>>>>>> are used to discard a peptide from being used in the protein quant?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "spctools-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to