On 5-Apr-07, at 9:24 AM, Recordon, David wrote: > Dick, see my other message but this is not about ME stopping you! >>> We wanted to publish them on the website so that other people could >>> look at them, but you did not want to do that, and you control the >>> domain. >> >> Dick, that isn't a fair statement at all. It is not my decision to >> make if schemas.openid.net should be created and the content you're >> proposing put there. I've asked you multiple times to have a >> conversation on this list ending in a formal vote (like we've done >> for many other spec decisions) to make this decision. If I've missed >> this vote then please point me at it. > > I'm quite honestly not sure what more to say. If you want to see this > work happen then you need to take the initiative and make it happen. > You can't just expect to post a few messages to the ID Schemas list > and > have them magically start working. > > I'm all about taking advantage of existing momentum, but I have a hard > time seeing anyone who cares about AX being unwilling to have this > discussion as a part of the ID Schemas community. If there is anyone, > I'd certainly like to understand the reasons why (beyond it being > "hard").
We wrote a spec. We have working code. Other people have developed code as well. We need to publish a schema so that we can systems talk to each other. If *you* would like to see the work done over in ID Schemas, then *you* can work to make it happen there. The same for other people. If the work shifts to there, I am fine with it. Right now, I'm fine with doing the work here on the OpenID specs list. -- Dick _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
