Are you creating your own query? Sorry if I'm being anal, but it seems like
this is a verity issue in general, not a Spectra issue. (I just want to see
where the problem lies exactly.)
Are you saying your running the _exact_ same code on all 4 boxes?
=======================================================================
Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN : 3679482
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michiel Boland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: Spectra-Talk
> Subject: RE: cfindex troubles
>
>
> > Ah, ok. Hmm, indexupdate is one of those tags that is supposed
> to be very
> > fast. I assume your NOT passing some huge glob of objects,
> right? Your just
> > passing one or two? And this slowness is still there even after
> you optimize
> > the collection?
>
> The test I am doing is with CFINDEXing a 19 row query. It takes 1 second
> on my NT4 box, 4 seconds on a Win2k box with identical hardware (don't
> know why this is so much slower but that's another story I guess) and 285
> and 193 seconds on two other machines. The test code creates a new
> collection so there is no chance the slowness would be caused by
> non-optimizedness. (I can't test anything right now - I have to rely on
> what ppl 100miles from me tell me. :)
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
