Can I try this program?
   
  Pedro

d_j_salvia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
  Gustav,

--- In [email protected], Gustav Fredell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you say it's a 100% that I win if I stay... awesome conclusion. Just 
> awesome...

Excuse me but i did not say that.

> You can't drag the law of large numbers into this the way you are
doing. 
> It has nothing to do with odds only being true for many trials or not. 
> It merely states that if you do something enough times it will converge 
> towards the "true" odds. Which in this case is 1/3 and 2/3.

You just said that I can't can't put in the realm of the law of large
numberfs, and then you immediately defend its position within the
realm of large numbers. You can't have it both ways - either it
applies or it doesn't. 

The number of games is part of where you are going wrong. There is one
trial is the classic example - what effect does it have on one game?
None. In the same way that you cannot predict when a radiactive atom
will decay.

>  So what it 
> in fact can be used for is to make the choices many times (like others 
> suggested), ad them up and calculate odds that come nearer and
nearer to 
> the real odds. In this way you can "prove" that the odds are in fact
1/3 
> and 2/3 if you do it enough times. I challenge you to repeat Bob's 100 
> trials and and test your hypothesis against a 95% confidence
interval or 
> so...

I wrote a program in Basic on an Atati 800. Making a choice between 1,
2, and 3 generated at random, I decided never to switch. Out of 100
"games" I "won the car" 76 times.

> With a solid year or so at university in probability and statistics and 
> very confident in this. Ask all the probability/statistics
professors in 
> the world if the odds are 1/3 and 2/3, and I strongly believe that the 
> law of large numbers will make the will make this converge towards 100% 
> agreeing. In fact I challenge you to ask a single
probability/statistics 
> professor about this and let us all know about his/her answer.

Why should I answer a challenge which is dependent upon how well
another person thinks? 

> Take on the one or both of the challenges above and then come back and 
> say it's not true. I bet you my upcoming 2x2x2 average WR that you
can't 
> do it ;)

I'm sorry you lost the bet. You probably had your heart set on the
2x2x2 average WR.

Regards,

David J

> /Gustav
> 
> d_j_salvia skrev:
> 
> >Hi Duncan and Stefan and Pedro and Evan,
> >
> >Sorry, you guys, but you aren't correct.
> >
> >In probability there's a thing called the law of large numbers. If you
> >generate a long enough string of numbers "randomly" that eventually
> >you would have every digit the same number of times. N oparticular
> >number is favored. Your answer relies upon this law of randomness.
> >
> >What is actually wrong with the standard answere you gave is that one
> >is not dealing with a large number of choices, and, as such, odds *do
> >not apply.*
> >
> >I went to a site with the software and made my choice and did not
> >switch and I won. Doing it more than once is outside the boundaries of
> >the game. 
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >David J
> >
> >
> >--- In [email protected], "Duncan Dicks"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>I Had a freind who wouldnt believe this no matter how often I
> >>    
> >>
> >explained the 
> >  
> >
> >>maths to him so he set up spreadsheet to test it out.  Very easy to
> >>    
> >>
> >do and 
> >  
> >
> >>confirmed what the maths tells you - you should switch!
> >>
> >>Duncan
> >>----- Original Message ----- 
> >>From: "aznseashell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[email protected]>
> >>Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 7:04 AM
> >>Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: (Off topic)3 doors...
> >>
> >>
> >>Haven't we had this dicussion before? Or was it in another cubing
group?
> >>
> >>The game is set up so that if you switch, a winning choice would
> >>become a losing choice and vice versa. In the beginning you had a 1/3
> >>chance of winning and 2/3 chance of losing. Staying with your choice
> >>doesn't change your odds of winning (the host will always be able to
> >>show you a door with nothing behind it no matter which door you
> >>picked), but switching will turn your probabability of winning to 2/3.
> >>
> >>If my explanation makes no sense, consider the situation with 100
> >>doors and one door with a prize. You pick a door, and the host shows
> >>you 98 doors with nothing behind them. Now it's much more obvious that
> >>you should switch, right?
> >>
> >>Shelley
> >>
> >>
> >>--- In [email protected], "richy_jr_2000"
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>It is counter intuitive, but if you are in this situation, your
> >>>chances would be better to switch to the other door.  It's actually
> >>>quite interesting.
> >>>
> >>>-Richard
> >>>
> >>>--- In [email protected], Pedro
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Ok, this is off topic, but is interesting...
> >>>>
> >>>>  (please forgive if I make some mistake on the english...)
> >>>>  Suppose you are at a TV show, where you have 3 doors. 1 of the
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>doors has a car, and the other 2 don't have anything. So, the show
> >>>presenter asks you to choose a door. So, you choose, but he doesn't
> >>>open your choosen door. He opens an empty door. Then, he makes a
> >>>question: do you want to continue with your first choice or change to
> >>>the other door?
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>  What do you do?
> >>>>  What situation gives you more chances of winning?
> >>>>
> >>>>  Think about it...
> >>>>
> >>>>  Pedro
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>> Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
> >>>>
> >>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >__________ NOD32 1.1340 (20051226) Information __________
> >
> >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >http://www.nod32.com
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
>





    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "speedsolvingrubikscube" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  

  


                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to