--- In [email protected], "Jasmine Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sub-60s is definitely possible with a 4-look LL.
Sub-17 is possible with a 4 look. I promise. :) Sub-24 on average is possible, too. > It's possible to go much faster than 60s with 4-look LL. I've seen > people do 30s solves with a 4-look LL! When you get very good at a 4 look, the odds to skip steps is very high. The way I perform it, the odds for a skipped step are about 41%. So it's more of a 3.5 look. > Are you solving with F2L pairs? If not then I'd advise that would be a > very valuable next step. F2L pairs are not that difficult to work out on > your own and they'll really improve your solve times once you get the > hang of them. > > Jasmine > http://speedcuber.blogspot.com F2L is key. You'll never get sub-20 if your F2L times are 30.xx. But you can still get sub-20's if your LL times are crap. Like I said, sub-24 on average is possible with a 4 look. I advise everyone to learn F2L (CFOP, Petrus, etc) before they even think about learning a 3 look. -Mike Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
