Thats wicked :) CMLL??? I'm not clear with what this is, I've heard
you mention it many times...never really asked about it...

Craig


> 
> In other news: New PB single 16.15 (I had a 16.43 today!) I'm still
> averaging around 21-22 though but..... I've finished learning CMLL!
> Including recognition! One look corners, and one look last layer for
> me :D. I just gotta get every case recognised and executed under two
> seconds. Then I'll be sub-20.
> 
> Rethinking my non-matching blocks technique :S
> 
> 
> ~Thom
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Craig Bouchard"
> <logitewty@> wrote:
> >
> > I'll reply to everyone in one post again:
> > 
> > Sapan: Nice to hear from you again, just the other day I was wondering
> > what happened to you...
> > 
> > Sven: Umm, I average around 26-27 when I'm warmed up, but I get a lot
> > of times varying around 20, especially the good and easy solves...I've
> > gotten quite a bit better in the last month and a half since Chris
> > Hardwick taught me F2L...I'm planning on learning PLL soon, and then
> > OLL, so hopefully these times become more regular...At school today I
> > got a lot of 22s and 23s and the likes, some faster, some slower...
> > 
> > Craig
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], sgowal <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought your average was around 30 seconds... did I miss
something?
> > > How did you manage to go sub-20? Is your standard deviation very
high?
> > > 
> > > Btw, congrats !
> > > 
> > > Sven
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Gilles van den
> > > Peereboom <gillesvdp@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Congratulations Craig :-)
> > > > 
> > > > Sapan Upadhyay a écrit :
> > > > > damn, you almost had me thinking that you got a sub-20 avg
> > > > >
> > > > > congrats though...
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/6/06, Craig Bouchard <logitewty@> wrote:
> > > > >   
> > > > >> Again to Darren: When I get home from school tonight I'll warm
> > up and
> > > > >> do an F2L average for you :)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Craig
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --- In [email protected], "Craig Bouchard"
> > > > >> <logitewty@> wrote:
> > > > >>     
> > > > >>> I'll try to address everyone:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thank you all for the congratulations...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> To Chris: I think I've found a fault with the DIYs...The
> edges are
> > > > >>> bigger than the center pieces (you know how there is an
opening
> > > on the
> > > > >>> one side of the edge) well that can slide over the center,
> which I
> > > > >>> have found can cause pops, and send center caps across the
> > > room...But
> > > > >>> I still love it :)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> To Darren: I used to do LBL, but I had always wanted to do
> > F2L...and
> > > > >>> Chris Hardwick taught me in December, and I've been using it
> ever
> > > > >>> since...I don't know how fast that F2L on that solve was, but
> > a few
> > > > >>> weeks ago I did an F2L average of around 19...but I think I'm
> > better
> > > > >>> than that now...It was just a fast fluid solve, and a 3LLL...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Craig
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --- In [email protected], smgfreak_dk
> > > > >>> <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >>>       
> > > > >>>> How fast can you two do F2L?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Darren
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>         
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Ah, so this was done with the new 2006 DIY?  Congrats, btw!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Chris
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>       
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>     
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -cubekid
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to