Alright, thanks Tim :) do you have any sort of instant messenger??? Craig
--- In [email protected], "Tim Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CMLL is part of Gilles Roux's method. It's where you do CLL but you > don't have to worry about pieces in the M slice. > > --- In [email protected], "mgwallisa" > <mattwallisa@> wrote: > > > > Aww, c'mon, Thom. I average 26s over a hundred solves and will > > have a few of those sub-20, surely you did too when you were > > averaging in the high 20's. An easy cross with a couple quick F2L > > pairs will take off a lot of non-lucky but easy seconds for us > high > > 20 guys. I just wish I could average a quick F2L. > > > > So what's CMLL? Is that M not supposed to be there? > > > > Matt > > > > --- In [email protected], "thomkirjava" > > <snkenjoi@> wrote: > > > > > > You've gotta be sceptical. > > > > > > Seeing as how your sunday contest average you have a week before > > your > > > 22.5 average was 34 seconds, plus you three/four look, plus you > > don't > > > know OLL/PLL. And you always seemed to be around 33 when i was > > racing > > > you about a week ago. > > > > > > Then there was that non-lucky OLL skip you claimed to have. > > > > > > > > > I'm not blatently calling you a liar, as you could be telling the > > > truth. But things like this just make it harder to belive. > > > > > > Crongratulations, if I'm mistaken. > > > > > > > > > In other news: New PB single 16.15 (I had a 16.43 today!) I'm > still > > > averaging around 21-22 though but..... I've finished learning > CMLL! > > > Including recognition! One look corners, and one look last layer > > for > > > me :D. I just gotta get every case recognised and executed under > > two > > > seconds. Then I'll be sub-20. > > > > > > Rethinking my non-matching blocks technique :S > > > > > > > > > ~Thom > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Craig Bouchard" > > > <logitewty@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'll reply to everyone in one post again: > > > > > > > > Sapan: Nice to hear from you again, just the other day I was > > wondering > > > > what happened to you... > > > > > > > > Sven: Umm, I average around 26-27 when I'm warmed up, but I > get > > a lot > > > > of times varying around 20, especially the good and easy > > solves...I've > > > > gotten quite a bit better in the last month and a half since > > Chris > > > > Hardwick taught me F2L...I'm planning on learning PLL soon, > and > > then > > > > OLL, so hopefully these times become more regular...At school > > today I > > > > got a lot of 22s and 23s and the likes, some faster, some > > slower... > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], sgowal > <no_reply@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I thought your average was around 30 seconds... did I miss > > something? > > > > > How did you manage to go sub-20? Is your standard deviation > > very high? > > > > > > > > > > Btw, congrats ! > > > > > > > > > > Sven > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Gilles van den > > > > > Peereboom <gillesvdp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations Craig :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Sapan Upadhyay a écrit : > > > > > > > damn, you almost had me thinking that you got a sub-20 > avg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > congrats though... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/6/06, Craig Bouchard <logitewty@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Again to Darren: When I get home from school tonight > I'll > > warm > > > > up and > > > > > > >> do an F2L average for you :) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Craig > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> --- In [email protected], "Craig > > Bouchard" > > > > > > >> <logitewty@> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> I'll try to address everyone: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Thank you all for the congratulations... > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> To Chris: I think I've found a fault with the > DIYs...The > > > edges are > > > > > > >>> bigger than the center pieces (you know how there is > an > > opening > > > > > on the > > > > > > >>> one side of the edge) well that can slide over the > > center, > > > which I > > > > > > >>> have found can cause pops, and send center caps across > > the > > > > > room...But > > > > > > >>> I still love it :) > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> To Darren: I used to do LBL, but I had always wanted > to > > do > > > > F2L...and > > > > > > >>> Chris Hardwick taught me in December, and I've been > > using it > > > ever > > > > > > >>> since...I don't know how fast that F2L on that solve > > was, but > > > > a few > > > > > > >>> weeks ago I did an F2L average of around 19...but I > > think I'm > > > > better > > > > > > >>> than that now...It was just a fast fluid solve, and a > > 3LLL... > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Craig > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> --- In [email protected], > > smgfreak_dk > > > > > > >>> <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>> How fast can you two do F2L? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Darren > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Ah, so this was done with the new 2006 DIY? Congrats, > > btw! > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Chris > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > -cubekid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
