Sorry, but the page seems to be unavailable:
http://www.helmsoft.org/cube/revenge/
I think the centers first solution is better, but if you're not very 
fast with the 3x3x3 or don't like the pairity cases at all, this is a 
good method.

Emanuele


--- In [email protected], "skeneegee" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you, I had found his site a few years ago while trying to 
solve
> Revenge. I wrote his solution on a piece of paper and memorized it
> that way and I haven't been able to find the site again since. I
> couldn't remember who's solution it was. I still can't find the 
page,
> does anyone know if it's still around?
> 
> My best time is like 4 min, I think it could be fast since there's
> never a pairity issue and there's no solve like 3x3x3 step.
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Emanuele"
> <bw.project@> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, no parity problem. It's the method I currently use. And if 
I'm 
> > not mistaken it's the Danny Dedmore's solution. I reached 2mins 
> > 57secs with this method (which is an eternity, I know).
> > 
> > Emanuele
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "skeneegee" 
> > <skeneegee@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ive done it like this for a long time,
> > > 
> > > 1 solve U and D centers
> > > 2 solve all corners
> > > 3 solve U and D edges
> > > 4 solve d edges
> > > 5 solve u edges
> > > 6 remaining centers
> > > 
> > > No pairities, but I'm not very fast with it (or the main way 
for 
> > that
> > > matter)
> > > 
> > > -mike
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], JohnLouis Louis
> > > <pjlmem@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >          From www.speedcubing.com I got a method for4*4*4 as 
> > follows
> > > > 1. solve the top layer centers
> > > > 2. solve the top layer cornors
> > > > 3. solve the top layer edges
> > > > 4. solve the middle layer edges
> > > > 5. solve bottom layer cornors
> > > > 6. solve bottomlayer edges
> > > > 7. solve the remaining centers
> > > >           Is it cage method ? Is anyone following the above 
> > method?
> > > If so what is the best timing ? won't we get pairity in this 
> > method ?
> > > >             Before trying, I like to get your expert opinion. 
Plz
> > > share your experiences with this method.
> > > >   
> > > > J.Bernett Orlando 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >                                 
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > >  Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
> > > > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all 
the 
> > time.
> > > > 
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to