Roger Binns wrote: > > Max Battcher wrote: > > 1) I think a split-HTML approach is better, but the person I'm > debating > > with has a preference for a giant single-file HTML build. > > Do they also want the stylesheets etc integrated into that single file? > I did consider the whole single file thing as my current documentation > download is a single html file with everything integrated into it. > Using Sphinx means distributing via a zip file but sphinx is so much > better I don't mind. Additionally the htmlhelp (Windows CHM) is single > file anyway and looks really good on Windows. On Linux (and I assume > other platforms using the CHM library) it looks less good since they > don't appear to bother with CSS or maybe only obey small parts of it.
I don't think most of the people requesting single-file HTML care all that much about the CSS and everything (albeit they would probably prefer it embedded as well). At least one said that he generally has CSS turned off entirely. I mentioned the CHM and PDF outputs as okay single file alternatives (in my eyes) but the people that prefer single file apparently like grep-ability. I personally don't really understand the request/need here, but I'm trying my best to facilitate the conversation. -- --Max Battcher-- http://worldmaker.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
