-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rotoflex vs. Camber Compensator
Bill, I have retrofitted my 70 Spitfire with rotoflex and a swing spring. It was not a straight forward conversion and took some time since I had to weld brackets and use the Triumph Tune shock conversion. The e-brake was an issue too. If you have a GT frame I would certainly recommend the rotoflex over anything else. I use my Spit for autocross and all other set ups I tried including anti roll bars resulted in the Spit "lifting a leg" with only one wheel on the ground in tight corners at speed. Cheers, Darrell Darrell, What could you possibly gain by combining the rotoflex with a swing spring? It would seem that by using a spring that is allowed to rotate side to side, you are reducing the roll stiffness of the car and detracting from the handling characteristics. Personally, I don't even like the swing-spring concept by itself and feel that the camber compensator is a far better fix to the wheel tuck problem. But I am interested to hear your thoughts on the combination of the two technologies. Joe (C) *** http://www.team.net/the-local *** Your messages not reaching the list? Check out http://www.team.net/posting.html *** unsubscribe/change address requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or try *** http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool *** http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo *** Archives at http://www.team.net/archive *** Edit your replies!
