Exactly! So adding it all up, just weighs more heavily on the conclusion that putting a swing spring on an early spit in opposition to a camber compensator is not an economically sound decision.
Thanks for that observation. Joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Muller Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Spits] [TR] spit suspension question On 9 Nov 2007 at 18:55, Joe Curry wrote: > But the increase in the sway bar was an effort to compensate for > the decrease in rear roll stiffness. Which is exactly why I brought it up. It is yet one more necessary thing that that fellow has to change if he wants to go to a swing- spring. BL did it for a reason and so must everyone else too. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html [email protected] http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires http://www.team.net/archive
