Robert,

On 8/26/15 10:49 , Robert Raszuk wrote:
Peter,

Your example is ok for the indexed srgb case. Yes I agree that in such
case what you present seems fine.

But if (as most operators I spoke with) are planning deployment of
absolute srgb why would I need to introduce indexes at all to deal with
per topology blocks rather then just advertise basic index less absolute
blocks to start with.

not sure what absolute SRGB means.

Offsets are used to simplify the configuration and as such are optional.

thanks,
Peter



Thx,
r.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Stephane,

    On 8/26/15 09:46 , [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

        Hi Peter,

        Yes I need to allocate a new SRGB, but my index space will be
        contiguous and I will be able to use the index 51 in each scope.


    configuration wise same can be achieved with the offsets - think of
    it as an internal SRGB local to the box. The only difference is what
    is advertised.


    1. per topology SRGB

    4 SRGBs:

    100-149 topology 1
    150-199 topology 2
    200-249 topology 1
    250-299 topology 2

    prefix51, topology 1 - SID index 51 -> SID 200
    prefix51, topology 2 - SID index 51 -> SID 250

    What is advertised:

    4 SRGBs (as above), prefix51 SID index 51

    -----------

    2. Per topology offset

    SRGB 100-299

    4 offsets (local to the box):

    0-49 topology 1
    50-99 topology 2
    100-149 topology 1
    150-199 topology 2

    prefix51, topology 1 - SID index 51 -> SID 200
    prefix51, topology 2 - SID index 51 -> SID 250

    What is advertised:

    1 SRGB (as above), 2 prefix SIDs - 101, 151

    thanks,
    Peter





        -----Original Message-----
        From: Peter Psenak [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>]
        Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 09:28
        To: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/IBNF; Eric C Rosen; Pushpasis Sarkar;
        SPRING WG
        Subject: Re: [spring] SRGBs, indexes, and topologies within a domain

        Hi Stephane,

        On 8/26/15 01:28 , [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

            Hi Peter,

            As I already pointed to Les, using an offset creates some
            holes in index space that we need to manage when extending a
            block.

            Let's say that we have SRGB [100-199] (to simplify) and you
            divide your block in two so you will have topology #1 using
            [100-149] and topology #2 using [150-199] using an offset of 50.
            Now I need to add a 51th node in my network, I cannot use
            index 51 because it will overlap with topology#2 :(, so I
            will need to skip indexes from 51 to 100, and restarts my
            numbering with index 101. This management of holes is not
            automated.


        how is this different to the case where you have two per
        topology SRGBs of 100-149 and 150-199 and now you need 51st SID?
        It is exactly the same problem. You need to allocate a new SRGB.

        thanks,
        Peter


            Best Regards,

            Stephane

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Peter Psenak [mailto:[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>]
            Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 13:18
            To: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/IBNF; Eric C Rosen; Pushpasis Sarkar;
            SPRING WG
            Subject: Re: [spring] SRGBs, indexes, and topologies within
            a domain

            Hi Stephane,

            On 8/25/15 12:58 , [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

                Hi Peter,

                        1. If a new topology is added by use of the MT
                        features of an IGP,
                        then a new set of prefix-SIDs must be
                        provisioned.  This seems like
                        a major provisioning task.  The alternative
                        would be to have an
                        SRGB per topology; then when you add a new
                        topology, you only have
                        one quantity to provision (or one per platform
                        perhaps).  I hear
                        some hand-waving about how easy it is to
                        provision new prefix-SIDs
                        for every new topology, but ...


                    I will keep repeating myself that such provisioning
                    can be made automatic, so the above point is not
                    really convincing to me.


                Could you explain how ? Based on past discussions, it
                does not seem to be so easy.


            simply by associating an offset and size from SRGP on a per
            topology basis.

            Example:

            SRGB 1600-24000

            I would assume that when you start to assign your SIDs for
            the default topology, you would not pick random values, but
            start from the beginning. So let' assume you are using 16001
            to 16500 for nodes in default topology.

            Now you need to add a new topology. You configure and offset
            of 2k for it, so the advertised SIDs for the new topology
            would start from 18001.
            If we assume that the 2k would be a reasonable size for each
            topology you can have 4 topologies with 2k SIDs per topology.

            If for whatever reason you run out of the SID space in any
            topology, you can configure another offset for those SIDs
            which do not fit into the existing range for such topology.

            All of the above is internal to the node and no per topology
            SRGB advertisement is required. You advertise unique SID on
            a per prefix and per topology basis, but you do not need to
            configure each SID manually.
            Al you need to configure is the single prefix SID and per
            topology offset/size. It gives you the same simplicity for
            configuration as per topology SRGB, but without the need to
            advertise SRGB per topology.

            thanks,
            Peter



                Best Regards,

                Stephane



                
_____________________________________________________________________
                _ ___________________________________________________

                Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
                informations
                confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas
                etre diffuses,
                exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
                ce message
                par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le
                detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
                electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange
                decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
                deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

                This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
                privileged information that may be protected by law;
                they should not be distributed, used or copied without
                authorisation.
                If you have received this email in error, please notify
                the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
                As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for
                messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
                Thank you.




            
______________________________________________________________________
            ___________________________________________________

            Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
            informations
            confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
            diffuses,
            exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
            message
            par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le
            detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
            electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange
            decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
            deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

            This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
            privileged information that may be protected by law; they
            should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
            If you have received this email in error, please notify the
            sender and delete this message and its attachments.
            As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages
            that have been modified, changed or falsified.
            Thank you.

            .



        
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

        Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
        informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
        pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si
        vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
        a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
        messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
        Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
        deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

        This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
        privileged information that may be protected by law;
        they should not be distributed, used or copied without
        authorisation.
        If you have received this email in error, please notify the
        sender and delete this message and its attachments.
        As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that
        have been modified, changed or falsified.
        Thank you.

        .


    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to