Surface fires involving flammable liquids, gases, and solids protected by total 
flooding do not have a
"high" flow rate, [ 1 minute to reach extinguishment concentration] it just a 
higher rate than deep
seated ( 2 Min to reach 30%).  My theory is that Surface fires involving 
flammable liquids, gases, and
solids will continue to grow in size or become more difficult to extinguish as 
time goes on. Re-flash
also becomes more likely. Deep seated fires are by definition  "not going 
anywhere soon" and 7 minutes
are allowed to reach design concentration. 

Subfloors don't have the venting problem because they are connected by many 
holes and vents to the
main room. But frankly, I'm uncomfortable with your design concept. I know of 
NO computer room
application where the above floor was protected with a clean agent and the 
subfloor protected with a
different clean agent. I am  neither an AHJ nor a PE, but I am a certifier of 
systems. I wouldn't
certify such a system if I ran into it installed somewhere. I would order it 
tagged "Non-compliant".  
     


Burton Ford
SET, CFPS
Member AFAA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
267-487-1000
Fax 267-487-1010

This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be 
confidential and privileged.  If
you receive this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby 
notified that you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication 
without the consent of the
sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please reply to 
the message immediately
by informing the sender that the message was misdirected.  After replying, 
please delete and otherwise
erase it and any attachments from your computer system.  Your assistance in 
correcting this error is
appreciated.  Thank you.  Cintas Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On
Behalf Of Reza Esmaeili
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:03 PM
To:     [email protected]
Subject:        RE: Carbon Dioxide System Discharge Time

Thanks All,
  Ford, if the intent of slow flow rate for deep seated fires is preventing 
over pressurization, so
why NFPA-12 suggest high flow rate for Surface fires involving flammable 
liquids, gases, and solids? 
  NFpa12 States that "Surface fires are the most common hazard particularly 
adaptable to
extinguishment by total flooding systems. They are subject to prompt 
extinguishment when carbon
dioxide is quickly introduced into the enclosure in sufficient quantity to 
overcome leakage and
provide an extinguishing concentration for the particular materials involved."
   
  NFpa12 also States that "For deep-seated fires, the required extinguishing 
concentration shall be
maintained for a sufficient period of time to allow the smoldering to be 
extinguished and the material
to cool to a point at which reignition will not occur when the inert atmosphere 
is dissipated."
   
  I think I explained at first in a bad manner. There are two protected area.
  1- Computer room: would be protected with FM-200 system
  2- Computer room subfloor with electrical equipment and cable runs: would be 
protected with high
pressure carbon dioxide system.
  My question is about subfloor, while NFPA 12 states that "For deep-seated 
fires, the design
concentration shall be achieved within 7 minutes, but the rate shall be not 
less than that required to
develop a concentration of 30 percent in 2 minutes." Is it a problem if the 
total discharge time would
be only 1 minute for this case? 
  Thanks,
  Reza
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I don't disagree just haven't had any of the sparky/computer types have
any warm fuzzies when you speak of wet pipe sprinklers. Usually with
reluctance they will accept the pre-action scheme but would rather have
nothing with water in the room at all. Then you explain the fact that
if there's a fire, the responders will most likely be bringing hoses in
and that sometimes gets their attention. 

In any case these types of situation are always a point of contention
mostly due to a lot of misinformation and fables.

But can you blame them with all those leaking, false tripping, deluge
systems they see on TV? 


Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lg.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Carbon Dioxide System Discharge Time

Craig:

I wasn't saying a pre-action sprinkler system instead of a wet pipe
system.
My preference is a wet system with independent smoke sensors tied to the
fire alarm system. The only time I use pre-action is when the owner is
the nervous type.

Otherwise, the water damage can be greater due to potential operation of
more heads due to the operational delay.

Regards,

James L.(Jim) Roberts, PE, SET
Fluor Corporation
100 Fluor Daniel Drive - C104F
Greenville, SC 29607
864.281.5149
864.281.4916(Fax)







Sent by:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To 
prinkler.org


08/23/2007 11:07 AM
cc 
Please respond to

sprinklerforum
Subject 
RE: Carbon
Dioxide System Discharge Time 


















Can the room be occupied at any time either by service personnel or
other occasional operators? Typically the answer would be yes as all
equipment needs human intervention at some time.

What Jim is saying is that a Pre-action sprinkler system would actually
be the best choice and the most cost effective with something like
FM-200 as the next choice instead of CO2. There are some serious life
safety issues you must consider when using CO2 in potentially occupied
spaces.



Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lg.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reza
Esmaeili
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 10:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Carbon Dioxide System Discharge Time

Jim,
I forgot to explain, the room doesn't have any operators at all, and
carbon dioxide is the best choice.
Thanks,
Reza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reza:

I would not recommend a CO2 system as it is potentially too dangerous. I
would consider a clean agent sytem per NFPA 2001.

Hopefully, this is only a back-up to a wet pipe system, which is still
my favorite.

Regards,

James L.(Jim) Roberts, PE, SET
Fluor Corporation
100 Fluor Daniel Drive - C104F
Greenville, SC 29607
864.281.5149
864.281.4916(Fax)




Reza Esmaeili

Sent by: To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email protected]
prinkler.org cc
08/23/2007 10:18 AM
Please respond to Subject
sprinklerforum Carbon Dioxide System Discharge Time











Hi all,
For designing a total flooding high pressure carbon dioxide system in a
3,500 cubic feet computer room with electrical equipment and cable runs,
I have specified my room as "Dry electrical hazard" with flooding factor
of
0.083 lb/cubic.feet and 50% design concentration according to NFPA-12.
My questions are as below:
1)- Is a computer room fire a deep seated fire?
2)- NFPA 12 states that "For deep-seated fires, the design concentration
shall be achieved within 7 minutes, but the rate shall be not less than
that required to develop a concentration of 30 percent in 2 minutes." Is
it a problem if the total discharge time would be only 1 minute for this
case?
Many thanks for your help in advance.
Reza


---------------------------------
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential
and/or privileged material.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this
message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender
and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



---------------------------------
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential
and/or privileged material. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this
message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer. 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender
and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. 
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


       
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake. 
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be 
confidential and privileged.  If you receive this e-mail and you are not a 
named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, 
print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of 
the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please reply 
to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected.  After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any 
attachments from your computer system.  Your assistance in correcting this 
error is appreciated.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to