Yes, Cliff, different addresses.........

Thanks -

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cliff Whitfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:58 PM
Subject: RE: what makes a "building"


> Garth,
>
> I'm not a building code guru but it sounds like different buildings to me.
> Do the buildings have different addresses?  To me, this sounds like a poor
> attempt to save $$ during the initial construction process.
>
> Hopefully all of the code experts haven't left for the evening and will
give
> you a more definitive answer.
>
> Cliff Whitfield
> Fire Design, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garth W.
> Warren
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: what makes a "building"
>
> Question - There are several dormitory clusters served by a single on-site
> 6" underground piping system.  The underground enters a building, passes
> through a backflow preventer, and then exits the building and serves the
> several clusters and the site hydrants around the clusters.  Each cluster
> consists of three to four structures which range from two to four stories
in
> height.  There are three clusters arranged around cul-de-sacs with an
> elevation difference between the upermost cluster and the lowest cluster
of
> about 35 feet.  Each structure has an underground gate valve with a curb
box
> (although the location of several of these could not be confirmed), a
> combination drain/test valve - piped with a piece of pipe shorter than a
> foot through the exterior wall, a flow switch and a FDC.  No structure has
a
> check valve or an internal control valve.
>
> I have been told that the ten to twelve structures are a single "building"
> (the portions of which are simply separated by several scores of yards)
and
> therefore the control valve and check valve are in the one building that
the
> underground enters and exits after passing through the backflow preventer.
> I am also being told that having no check valve between the FDC and the
> hydrants is not a problem.
>
> Both firsts for me.
>
> I have looked through the standards and can not find chapter or verse on
> which to base a response.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Garth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to