There are plenty of water districts out there that do their own street
work up to face of, or back of curb.  We work regularly with at least
one that REQUIRES a second in-line valve at the termination.  Not a
blow-off, not a cap or plug, but a valve.  So once you extend into the
property and build a backflow (exterior, above grade here in sunny
SoCal), you get FOUR control valve at the exterior of a system.  

As for the 40 foot distance, I'm only speculating, but there are plenty
of FD's out there that consider the building height and make that the
minimum distance.  We see that throughout the Southwest, especially with
tilt-up buildings.   In case of wall failure, they want the step-down
point out of harm's way ...

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PIV 40ft from Building

I don't have a copy of NFPA 13-2007, but in the 2002 edition, 8.15.1.1 
would prohibit use of a curb box valve in a sprinkler system supply
line. 
They would be permissible for hydrant control valves only, right?  If
I'm 
the one missing something, let me know.

James L.(Jim) Roberts, PE/SET
Fluor Corporation
100 Fluor Daniel Drive - C104F
Greenville, SC 29607
864.281.5149
864.281.4916(Fax)





Roland Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/18/2008 11:13 AM
Please respond to sprinklerforum

To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: PIV 40ft from Building







Mr Frustrated

This requirement has been in standard a long time so without 
researching it, I suspect only Chet Schirmer may know what the 
committee was thinking.

I have always wondered why we still had it in the standard since it 
had to have been driven from the old days when mainly industrial 
facilities had sprinklers.  It even refers to the plant yard in the 
text.  It is so seldom used today.  I know the DOE plant that I did 5 
years of hard time at, there were no PIV's.

Why don't you drop the PIV and just use the curb valve?  IF they 
really want exterior access, put in a wall PIV.

I'll look to see if there is a proposal that we can hang a comment on 
for the ROC meeting.  I don't remember anything touching this so it'll 
probably be next cycle.  Put it on your list of items to submit.

Roland

On Jun 18, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Mark Sornsin wrote:

> Forum:
>
>
>
> Anyone know the reason WHY PIVs are to be located at least 40 ft. from
> the building (on a fire service line piped into the building)?
>
>
>
> I have heard some theories - like to keep the valve free from a
> collapsing wall.  But I am curious if any of you have any definitive
> explanations for that number.  Why not 30 ft.? Why not 50 ft.
>
>
>
> We are dealing with an AHJ who is requiring we pipe an underground an
> additional 200+ ft. around a corner just so our PIV can be at least 40
> ft. from the building.  Otherwise, if we pipe straight out the 
> building,
> the public right-of-way is such that we'd be only 31 ft. from the
> building with the PIV.  This is not good enough for this gentleman
> since, as he says, it is POSSIBLE for you to get it 40 ft. away (with
> the 200+ ft. of underground).  If there was no other way, he would 
> have
> allowed the 31 ft. separation.
>
>
>
> Frustrated-in-Fargo, PE
>
> Fire Protection Engineer
>
> Ulteig Engineers, Inc.
>
> 3350 38th Avenue S.
>
> Fargo, ND 58104-7079
>
>
>
> Direct:    701. 280.8591
>
> Fax:        701.280.8739
>
> Cell:        701.371.5759
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> www.ulteig.com <http://www.ulteig.com/>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice
>
> This message may contain privileged and confidential information. If 
> you
> think, for any reason, this message may have been addressed to you in
> error, you   must not disseminate copy or take any action in 
> reliance on
> it, and we would ask you to notify me immediately by return email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.  
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are 
hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, 
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon 
this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.  
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to