I thank the participants in this discussion.

It was most helpful.

To summarize:

NFPA 13 2002 requires 14 heads for hydraulic calc if there are sprinklers
below obstructions. 

NFPA 13 2007 omitted this specific statement. 

Quote:

14.4.3 The design area shall consist of the most hydraulically demanding
area of 12 sprinklers, consisting of four sprinklers on each of three branch
lines. 

14.4.4 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions, the
discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of the levels shall be included
with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations.

The good handbook as quoted below interprets it as specified in NFPA 13
-2002. 

Thanks again.

Dan
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 16:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ESFR Heads below obstructions

NFPA 13 Handbook, 2007 edition, section 14.4.4 has a FAQ on this:

"FAQ - Where additional ESFR sprinklers are added below obstructions, what 
is the total number of sprinklers that must be calculated?"

Response to FAQ:

"Additional ESFR sprinklers installed below fixed obstructions, as 
required by the obstruction provisions of Chapter 8, must be included in 
the hydraulic calculations.  Subsection 14.4.4 requires that up to an 
additional two ESFR sprinklers located below obstructions be included with 
the 12 ESFR sprinkler calculations for a total of up to 14 ESFR 
sprinklers.  The maximum of two additional ESFR sprinklers applies 
regardless of the number of ESFR sprinklers installed below obstructions 
in the remote area.  Where only one additional ESFR sprinkler is needed to 
address an isolated obstruction, only that one ESFR sprinkler needs to be 
added to the calculation.  Care must be taken to identify the appropriate 
hydraulic remote area when such additional ESFR sprinklers are installed 
below the fixed obstructions.  The additional two ESFR sprinklers need 
only to be added to the 12 ESFR sprinkler demand directly above the 
obstruction when the combined number of sprinklers creates the 
hydraulically most demanding area."

The same FAQ and notes are shown for other sections listed below.

Hope that helps some.

Andrew Weisfield




"danarbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/05/2008 08:55 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
<[email protected]>
cc

Subject
RE: ESFR Heads below obstructions






It has nothing to do with competiveness. 

I'm not a contractor. 

It is a matter of replacing a public supply with A 1500gpm pump and 350cum
Tank. 

Not a small change. 

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November, 2008 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ESFR Heads below obstructions

Really?  Two heads will keep you from being competitive?  That must be 
some
real close bidding.


Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ch2m.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fletcher, 
Ron
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ESFR Heads below obstructions

If you add the flow of two additional heads below obstructions you won't 
be
low bid. The added flow will probably drive your main sizes up a pipe size
and it may affect the fire pump as well.

It isn't all that dissimilar to storage racks. We know if racks with solid
shelves are added to a warehouse the flow for the in-rack sprinklers would
have to be added into the roof calc yet we don't make an allowance for 
them
in the shell system, at least we don't.

Around here TI contractors chop up ESFR systems by adding heads at 
demising
walls and under ducts but they don't do a new roof system calc.
I would bet that 8 out of 10 ESFR systems in Phoenix don't calc after TI 
but
AHJ's around here either don't care or more likely don't know.

Ron Fletcher
Aero Automatic
Phoenix, AZ


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of danarbel
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ESFR Heads below obstructions

Well, I read all that and it seems that all you need are 12 heads

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November, 2008 7:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ESFR Heads below obstructions

Dan,

All references here are from the '07 edition of NFPA-13:

14.4.4 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions,

the discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of the levels shall be
included with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations.

15.4.4 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions,

the discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of  the levels shall be
included with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations.

16.2.3.5 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions,
the discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of the levels shall be
included with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations

16.3.3.6 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions,
the discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of the levels shall be
included with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations.

17.2.3.4 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions,
the discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of the levels shall be
included with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations.

17.3.3.5 Where ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions,
the discharge for up to two sprinklers for one of the levels shall be
included with those of the other level in the hydraulic calculations.

22.4.4.6.4 The requirements of 22.4.4.6.1 to include every sprinkler in 
the
design area to be included in the system discharge shall not apply; where
ESFR sprinklers are installed above and below obstructions, the discharge
for up to two sprinklers from one of the levels shall be included with 
those
of the other level in the hydraulic calculation.

Based on what I read in the ROP just published it doesn't look like any of
these have been removed, although it appears that the wording in
22.4.4.6.4 has been moved around a bit, and a new 22.4.4.6.4.1 has been
added (See 13-462, Log CP82 in the ROP)

Hope that is what you were after.
*
*PARSLEY CONSULTING

Ken Wagoner, SET
760.745.6181 voice
760.745.0537 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> e-mail
www.ParsleyConsulting.com <http://www.ParsleyConsulting.com> website



danarbel wrote:
> Question regarding the number of ESFR heads required for hydraulic
calc.
>
> The nominal number is 12.
>
> There was a requirement to add 2 heads if there are heads installed
below
> beams or AC ducts.
>
> If I'm not wrong the addition of 2 heads was abolished.
>
> Please confirm or correct me,
>
> Dan Arbel
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


__________ NOD32 3585 (20081105) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)




This email is intended for named recipients only.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to