Actually, the IBC section on limited area sprinkler systems goes up to 19 heads 
("fewer than 20").  It also requires a hydraulic calc with a simultaneous 
plumbing demand.


Eric J. Shelton, PE
Senior Fire Protection Engineer

Hankins and Anderson
Consulting Engineers
4880 Sadler Road Suite 300
Glen Allen, VA 23060
 
v: (804) 521.7105 f: (804) 217.8520
http://www.haengineers.com


 Do you really need to print this e-mail?


-----Original Message-----
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:56 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Limited Area sprinkler systems

I've done a few of the partial systems according to NFPA 101, but as 
you say, it is just a couple of heads in a space. That tops out a 6 
sprinklers. However, the IBC one appears to go to 20. The one I have 
been asked to look at is 18.



At 08:32 AM 3/31/2009, you wrote:
>I have done a few of these type systems. Usually the ones I have done
>involve a mechanical room with a gas furnace or an elevator equipment room.
>
>Karen Purvis
>Senior Designer
>Facility Systems Consultants
>713 South Central Street,
>Suite 101
>Knoxville, TN 37902
>ph.865-246-0164
>fax 865-246-1084
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
>[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
>Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 AM
>To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
>Subject: Limited Area sprinkler systems
>
>The IBC mentions Limited Area sprinkler systems with a veiled
>reference being 20 sprinklers or less. However, there is no formal
>definition or description as to what they are or where they are
>allowed. Any thoughts or experience with this? I have a proposal on
>my desk for a partial system covering some sleeping rooms above a
>restaurant (for employees). The rest of the building is unprotected.
>Supposedly it is being required to renew their liquor permit. Since I
>doubt the Liquor Commission has jurisdiction over fire protection,
>I'm assuming that this is coming from the Fire Marshal.
>
>Todd G. Williams, PE
>Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>Stonington, Connecticut
>www.fpdc.com
>860.535
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
www.fpdc.com
860.535.2080  
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to