Is it March yet? BAF -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: QR vs SSP sprinklers in LH vs OH delivery
Scott: Once again you get lost in your own "Common" sense, and lose the "Common-sense" of everyone else. Codes and standards can't address every situation or occupancy on a case by case situation so some generalizations have to be made. These are made to cover the vast majority of situations. We all know of specific instances where the code or standard provides NO or insufficient guidance. THIS IS NOT ONE OF THOSE. The guidance is clear, the reasoning has been shown for that decision, and yet you pontificate "Hybridization" as your "Common Sense" for ignoring what the standard spells out quit clearly. Common Sense is a form of majority rule. Your common sense in this case is my "What the heck is he thinking?" Off the soap box, let's find a new thread. Thom McMahon, SET Firetech, Inc. 2560 Copper Ridge Dr P.O. Box 882136 Steamboat Springs, CO 80488 Tel: 970-879-7952 Fax: 970-879-7926 QR sprinklers are great. So are Code prescriptions. Common-sense in this particular hybridized Code application also deserves mention. scot deal excelsior fire engineering _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
