A cooling tower is a gigantic water based air cleaner. You would not believe the fine particulates it will clean from the air, plus the slime it creates. All of this is trapped by the tower since it is evaporating the water leaving the particulates behind. The tower operators have to balance how much water is needed to constantly flush the crap out (turnover) with the cost of the chemicals needed to add to the makeup water that keep corrosion and gook buildup at bay. Take a close look inside of a chiller's condenser tube bundle the next time you see one open for cleaning. The fine particulate is worse in dry dusty conditions with ground level cooling towers. Using this water in a system that you cannot open up for regular cleaning may not be a good idea.

Allan Seidel
St. Louis,  MO

On Dec 29, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Roland Huggins wrote:

The DOE plant I spent what seemed a life time used the cooling tower basins (nice to have a million gal of water available) as back up with potable as the primary source (to fill and maintain water on the system). The water was treated for corrosion so that aspect is not an issue. I don't remember the water having a particulate issue (assumed filtration was done as part of the cooling tower operation). I'm sure the water is far cleaner that raw water from a pond whereby just minimal straining is required.

Roland

On Dec 29, 2010, at 9:50 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected] > wrote:

Got a project in South America, poor to no municipal infrastructure for water to serve the fire pump. Owner has issues with spending money for a tank and wants to use the cooling tower basin as the fire pump water source. The total capacity required is 675,000 gallons and the big issue is airborne contaminants that will find their way in the open basin. The cooling water systems will use filtration units to separate the contaminants but I've got issue with this water being used for fire protection systems. Strainers will not work, not fine enough to capture the particulate. The water coming in to the basin isn't considered potable by our standards.

My major concerns are MIC and clogging of sprinkler heads when this stuff settles. We have a mix of Office wet pipe systems as well as outdoor exposed dry pipe systems up to 100 ft in height.

The problem with filtration may be the 3,750 gpm flow rate and the pressure drop through the system on the suction side of the pump.

Any thoughts, suggestions?

My initial inclination is to reject the concept. The cost of the filtration system would probably be close or more than an above ground storage tank.

Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to