Cecil, Congrats on the grads! Keep pumping them out.

It will be very interesting to see what the Task Force comes out with.



At 09:16 AM 3/29/2011, you wrote:

>I am not sure where you guys have landed in this discussion, but wanted to 
>chime in with the latest work being done by the NFPA 13 Committee. And more 
>specifically, the work being done by the "Ceiling Cloud Task Group".  We have 
>begun the tough process of introducing changes to the standard that will 
>inlcude rules for ceiling clouds.  I gave a presentation to the Committee of 
>our task group's work at the ROP meeting in February.  The task group includes 
>the Chair, David Fuller from FM Global, and Steve Scandaliato, Mike Meehan and 
>others.  (Please, if you don't know who these people are, take a miute to look 
>them up.  It is awesome to know these folks!)
> 
>As it currently stands, ceiling clouds are obstructions and require sprinklers 
>beneath (resulting in protection above and below).  The calculations are only 
>required to include one level of the sprinklers.  Both are NOT requiredto be 
>calculated together.  No addtional sprinklers from the lower elevation are 
>required to be included in the remote area at the deck. And vice versa.  
>However, you would need to calculate both levels to determine which is the 
>most demanding area.   
> 
>We are asking the Research Foundation (NPRF) to sponsor testing of the 
>scenarios that Tom Wellen has modeled.  All of the Task Group's work starts 
>with Tom's models.  We have yet to come to any conclusions for the new rules.  
>But we will likely have separate guidance in the 2013 edition for cloud 
>ceilings so that you will not always have to have sprinklers required above 
>and below and how one might have to calculate these scenarios. (the Academy 
>students got to draw some of the examples that we hope make it into the 
>standard...)
>
>And by the way..... the Academy ROCKS!!!  We are graduating our first students 
>next month.  Four folks will be getting their Associate's Degree in Sprinkler 
>System Technology from Parkland College!!  We are going to have one serious 
>party.  And you are all invited to come!  (Now, if I can just get Ron Greenman 
>to move to Champaign...)
> 
> 
>It should be recognized that the above is my opinion as a member of the NFPA, 
>and has not been processed as a formal interpretation in accordance with the 
>NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects and should therefore not be 
>considered, nor relied upon, as the official position of the the NFPA, nor any 
>of their technical committees. 
>
> 
>Sincerely,
>
>
>Cecil Bilbo 
>Academy of Fire Sprinkler Technology
>Champaign, IL
>217.607.0325
>www.sprinkleracademy.com
>[email protected]
> 
>OUR STUDENTS SAVE LIVES!!
>
>
>
>
> 
>                                          
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to