Important information revealed.  You'll probably get other feedback on this
but the V-B construction type matched up with the A-3 use would seem to
dictate a fully sprinklered 2-story building (IBC Table 503 and 504.2).  If
the architect is relying solely on 902.2.1.3 and 903.2.1 I believe he/she is
missing the Table 503 implications.  Of course this interpretation is based
on a reading of the IBC and no other building specifics.  To go to 2 stories
the automatic sprinkler system must be per NFPA 13 (504.2 and 903.3.1.1) and
here I'm not sure how a combustible attic can be excluded, even with
draftstops, but maybe there's something I've missed.

With V-A construction the 2-story would seem to be acceptable, but then you
would need to figure out if the "attic" is considered a story or not (see
STORY definition on IBC page 20).  If it is not a story then it could be
considered part of the 2nd floor which would need to be sprinklered per
903.2.1.  In either case you are led pretty much to a sprinklered attic, but
this last part is my interpretation of where things would go.

Bill Brooks

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Building trade off update

Completely understand and as always appreciate your input my friend. 


V-B
Basement        8,000
1st             8,500
2nd             8,000

Reviewing the referenced section 1018.1 and its exceptions. 

Thanks,

Rod

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Brooks
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Building trade off update

See IBC Table 1018.1, Note c.  Also 

Also for our information, what is building construction type and what is
area per floor?

I'm trying to learn just as you are.

Bill Brooks

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Building trade off update


I wanted to follow up and let everyone who helped me think through the
process know what happened. This was a new two story courthouse (A3) with a
combustible attic above the 2nd floor and a single (B) occupancy attached
adjacent on the ground floor.  IBC 2009. He was sprinklering the basement,
1st and 2nd but not the attic. We met with the Architect and and asked him
if he could educate us on his decision tree that allowed:


 1.   No sprinklers in the combustible attic that was draft stopped every
3,000 ft.
 2.   Install fire protection on the first and second floors (not  required
systems in the A3) to allow a reduction in fire rating of the corridor
walls, stairs, and the wall separating the courtroom A3 from the B
occupancy.
 3.  His logic for not mandating an increase of the design area on the 2nd
floor to 3,000 ft.

His answers were:


 1.  The IBC 2009 doesn't require sprinklers  except for the basement, so
NFPA 13 isn't applicable.
 2.  He stated that the IBC allows for reduction with partial systems. 901.2
"exception"
 3.  He believed that because partial systems are allowed and that because
the code didn't require a system in the attic that we wouldn't need to
increase our area on the 2nd floor even though the combustible attic above
was unsprinklered.

We took the advice of GC / Roland and others and listened and accepted what
he said. The tone of the meeting was very good and at the end of the day I
am glad he chose more sprinklers than required in lieu of more rating. I
personally don't agree with the lack of increase in area ( question #3) but
as it has been pointed out...... not my decision.

Thanks for all the input and help. We learn and move on.


Rod DiBona
Rapid Fire Protection

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to