Craig:

We ran into something similar on a building expansion recently. There were 4 existing systems and we were adding a new system. The building had an existing fire pump. Apparently, the city supply was upgraded significantly, as we had the original flow test from the original drawings. We discussed it with the owner, and they decided to put a pressure reducing valve on each riser, instead of on the manifold. We knew the base of riser demands from the riser stickers. So, the installing contractor just set the PRV's at about 10 psi above the base of riser pressures. If I recall correctly, BOR pressure was about 150 psi so they set the PRV at 160.

What amazed me about this, is that after some investigation of prior pump test reports, it was found that the pump discharge pressure had been above 200 psi for about 5 years. The inspection company never mentioned that this might be an issue.

On 8/25/2011 8:41 AM, ParsleyConsulting wrote:
Jim,
Maybe I missed the intro to what Craig was asking about, but I had the impression that these systems were existing. That would make it very difficult if not impossible to replace the sprinklers and fittings with higher rated devices.

Craig?  Existing or new?

PARSLEY CONSULTING

Ken Wagoner, SET

760.745.6181 voice

760.745.0537 fax

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>e-mail

www.ParsleyConsulting.com <http://www.ParsleyConsulting.com>website



On 8/25/2011 8:35 AM, Jim Davidson wrote:
Why not use 250 psi rated high pressure sprinklers and use 300 psi rated fittings, pipe and pipe joining devices such as Vic Grooved product and 300 psi rated ductile threaded fittings. These products were developed to reduce the number of PRVs in high rise buildings. There should be no problem with using 250 psi rated sprinkler heads and 300 psi rated pipe and fittings. You just need to check the rating with the manufacturer's working pressure.

Have a fire safe day.

Jim Davidson
  Davidson Associates
Fire Protection * Medical Gas * Code Consulting 302-994-9500 Fax:302-234-1781


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:46 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pressure reducing valves on system risers

I've already been told, no changes to the pumping systems or their settings.

The idea of a large one with a smaller on a bypass may be the way to go but I have to wait to see if the owner wants one on the run-in or one on each system riser off the manifold.

Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pressure reducing valves on system risers

Also what is the highest demand sprinkler or standpipe system ? Is pump is overdesign see if modification to fire pump be done I.e. Change impeller
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: "Morey, Mike"<[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:44:07
To:<[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pressure reducing valves on system risers

Can you provide a pair of PRVs at each manifold? Typically we'd look at a large valve (say 6 or 8") with a bypass through a smaller valve (maybe a 3"). Large PRVs have a minimum flow rate much higher than one sprinkler would flow so the smaller PRV allows for low flows like those that would be found when a single sprinkler activates.

Mike Morey, SET, CFPS
Sprinkler Designer
BMW Constructors, Inc.
O: 317.651.0596 | C: 317.439.2695
www.bmwc.com

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]
Sent: Thu 8/25/2011 8:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pressure reducing valves on system risers



Ah there's the rub. This is a multi-building manufacturing site. HUGE! A mixture of very large buildings and some not so large, multi-story and single story. But a single story could be 50 ft high. The problem is that the pump is overdesigned. Not sure if the municipal supply changed or just a bad pump selection. Either way doesn't matter. Already been told that they will not make any changes to the pumps. So, any corrective action will be provided at the risers.

They have a standard that dictates that buildings be zoned and that each zone is served by a separate riser. Case in point, a new 2-story, 60 ft high, 60,000 total sq. ft. building has 8 system risers fed off two manifolds, one at each end of the 300ft long building. I can't do combination standpipe risers either.

Welcome to my world.................

Craig P



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 8:25 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Pressure reducing valves on system risers

What is the building like? (are there upper floors that wont need PRV's?) what is the water supply like?

Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP
Sales Engineer
Alliance Fire Protection
130 w 9th Ave.
North Kansas City, MO 64116

*Licensed in KS&  MO

913.888.0647 ph
913.888.0618 f
913.927.0222 cell
www. AFPsprink.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Pressure reducing valves on system risers

Got a major client whose system was poorly designed. They have their jockey pump set for about 200 psi and their main fire pump is putting out 180-190 psi. The local fire marshal has mandated that they provide pressure reducing valves on the system risers for all new systems. Anyone ever done this? Any recommendations?

Forget about doing the logical thing and looking at the pump, there is very little common sense here and the process of change is long and painful.

Craig P


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20110825/5d49a3fd/attachment.bin>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to