Would it be an issue of hydraulically most remote vs physically most remote?


At 11:17 AM 4/3/2012, you wrote:
>Got a submittal package where the contractor has two divided rooms.  One is 
>0.40/3000 and adjacent room is .17/2000.  He is calculating the .40 area and 
>has extended his hyd remote area beyond the wall of the room into the adjacent 
>.17 area and calced about 8 heads.
>The .40 room is plenty large enough to allow the additional sprinklers to be 
>calced from within the room.
>
>Off the top of your head does anyone know where this type of thing is 
>addressed within NFPA 13?
>
>Craig L. Prahl, CET   
>Fire Protection 
>CH2MHILL
>Lockwood Greene
>1500 International Drive
>Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
>Direct - 864.599.4102
>Fax - 864.599.8439
>CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>[email protected]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to