The amount of significant digits we work to in various aspects is quite varied.
Some folks believe calc programs down to the .001 level when it all comes down 
to a gauge bouncing around in a variable water supply with uncontrolled changes.
Yet we worry about inches in other areas.


George L.  Church, Jr., CET  
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
877-324-ROWE       570-837-6335 fax
g...@rowesprinkler.com



-----Original Message-----
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brad Casterline
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 7:37 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RTI

never mind (coffee worked), it's called 'nobody makes them because they would 
not be UL Listed', and it points out the amazing (to me) tolerances sprinklers 
are manufactured to.

-----Original Message-----
From: bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com [mailto:bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:34 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE:RTI

correction, meter, not feet. i should have looked in 13 instead of trying to 
recall and thinking i needed to convert. but i now have another (perhaps 
stupid) question re the definition of fast response and standard response: if 
fast is RTI=50 or less and standard is 80 or more, what is in between called? I 
am really more interested in the reasoning for the DEFINITION in NFPA #13, not 
some box of heads in RTI limbo. Any TC members out there not totally fed-up 
with me yet?

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to