I'd say Special Application, usually a larger K Factor that reduces pressure 
demand compared to what you might ordinarily used.

Think of a K25 ESFR's ability to reduce pressure requirements to eliminate the 
need for a fire pump since you only need 15 PSI instead of 75.


George L.  Church, Jr., CET  
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
877-324-ROWE       570-837-6335 fax
g...@rowesprinkler.com



-----Original Message-----
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Cesar Lira
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:25 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Sprinkler design for class IV rack storage

Hi Scot.
Could you explain what do you mean with Ergo named S.A.?

C.L.R. 


-----Mensaje original-----
De: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] En nombre de å... ....
Enviado el: jueves, 20 de septiembre de 2012 03:34 a.m.
Para: SprinklerFORUM@firesprinkler.org
Asunto: Sprinkler design for class IV rack storage

Andrei:

You might be able to avoid a pump if you go in-rack.  but your client
probably will experience a broken in-rack sprinkler   in their future
operations, and be quite upset.

Special application sprinklers usually offer an advantage by reducing the 
demand for  pressure-volume work (i.e. pump size), ergo their name "SA".

Control-mode, ceiling-only will probably demand a bit more  pressure-volume 
work from your source, but the sprinkler might be a bit less expensive that SA.

Since you are attempting to design a sprinkler system without having to replace 
a fire pump, it appears you will need to pursue each option and see what the 
demand is, relative to the supply your pump offers.  There are slight 
improvements that can be made to pump performance, based upon changing out 
impellers, but that is only if the demand is close to the pump's current supply 
capacity.


There is no single 'best' answer.  You, as designer need to weigh your 
variables and make a judgment (and describe the rationale) for the stakeholders 
as to why you choose what you chose.



scot deal
excelsior fire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachment
s/20120920/1bef6c88/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to