LOL.  Thanks for looking into this.

Jack Fairchild


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 5:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

So I asked a couple of code consultants I know who are VERY active in the ICC 
code development community, and one of them directed my question
to a technical staffer at ICC, from whom I received a reply.   I'm not
going to name names, because it's so convoluted that I'm not sure anyone wants 
to (or functionally can) take ownership of this requirement.
After the WTC attack, there was a task group called the ICC Ad Hoc Committee on 
Terrorism Resistant Buildings that proposed several changes pertaining to very 
tall buildings and other high value potential
targets.   I have attached the public commentary from the 2009 code
cycle that pertains to these sections.  Click the link below and search
for item G46-07/08.   

What was proposed was more restrictive and more articulate than what was 
adopted but you can see that the intent is to create redundancy of primary 
water supply components, including "risers", whether they be combined standpipe 
or dedicated sprinkler risers.  Unfortunately, the adopted code is laden with 
undefined terms, such as an especially "sprinkler zone".  In high-rise fire 
alarm systems, a floor is automatically a zone, (but it's not reciprocal as a 
floor can have more than one zone), but we generally refer to floor controls, 
not zone controls.  (Unless you're working for the VA, but that's another story
altogether.)   But it does seem in infer that the intent was to create
redundancy by interconnecting standpipes or risers at the top and bottom of a 
building system zone, and thus make it possible to keep water flowing if one 
was taken out of service, which would imply interconnecting each floor. Except 
the adopted text says you can't connect adjacent floors, which would mean that 
we need four risers per building system zone, or something along those lines.

ICC staff implied to me that making two connections to the water supply might 
fulfill the intent of the section, but that's separately prescribed and does 
not adequately separate building system redundancy from water supply 
redundancy, and those of us doing a high-rise in a seismic zone will generally 
dump the two water supplies into a reserve
or break tank ahead of the pump (or first pump, if a series).    So I
withdraw what I stated earlier in certain terms, even though I'm pretty sure 
it's accurate.  Please add the words, "Until someone can prove me wrong or sort 
this out, it's my opinion that you ..."  and then take the
rest of it.   In the proposal log for the 2009 IBC, Item G46-07/08 is
noted as AMPC, which means Approved as Modified by Public Comment.
Meaning that if an AHJ thinks you have to loop each floor, then you probably do 
because the report on public comments seem to support the concept of 
redundancy, even though the code itself really doesn't lay it out that way.  


http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Documents/2007-08cycle/FAA/IBC-G1-G58.pd
f


Steve Leyton
Confused and Frustrated




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fairchild, Jack
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 10:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

Since "zone" is undefined, this sentence could be interpreted as requiring two 
feeds per floor.  Considering the sentence after it this does not appear to be 
the intent.

"Each sprinkler system zone in buildings that are more than 420 feet
(128 000 mm) in building height shall be supplied by no fewer than two risers."


JACK FAIRCHILD


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 1:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

That's a good point; the question was whether or not there had to be two 
connection on each floor, which is not required. But as you say, for very tall 
buildings it is now required that you have two risers supplying alternate 
floor.  The code is mute on whether you can connect a floor to more than one 
riser, but the implication would be that you can't unless the adjacent floors 
can be supplied by a different riser or risers, which tempers my previous 
response.

The foregoing is my opinion only and does not necessarily represent the opinion 
or intent of the NFPA 14 Technical Committee on Standpipe and Hose Systems.

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting
San Diego, CA


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fairchild, Jack
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

The 2012 IBC requires duel risers when buildings are over 420 feet in height.  
Don't forget the secondary water supply to the fire pump.

[F] 403.3.1 Number of sprinkler risers and system design. Each sprinkler system 
zone in buildings that are more than 420 feet (128 000 mm) in building height 
shall be supplied by no fewer than two risers. Each riser shall supply 
sprinklers on alternate floors. If more than two risers are provided for a 
zone, sprinklers on adjacent floors shall not be supplied from the same riser.

Jack Fairchild

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

Thanks,
That's when I have run into it also but someone in the office thought it was 
for any high rise so since I couldn't find anything in 13 I thought I check 
here just in case.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Mackinnon
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

The only time I've had to have two water supplies within a high rise, was a 
Ritz Carlton (due to a Marriott Hotel Specification) 

Steven MacKinnon
Senior Fire Protection Engineer
Hartcorn Plumbing & Heating Inc.
850 South 2nd Street
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
631-580-2300 - Office
631-580-1090 - Fax
[email protected]
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:10 AM
To: SprinklerFORUM
Subject: High rise building - dual floor system supplies?

Does a high rise building require that the sprinkler system on each floor be 
dual feed?  IE: supplied from 2 individual standpipes per floor.

Thanks, 

 

Dewayne Martinez

Design Build Fire Protection

262-784-7900 (w)

262-784-8401 (f)

414-349-0468 (cell)

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attach
ments/20120924/9381b730/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to