Tent drying is a separately walled off area with insulated panels and temperature control. I'm assuming there will be some supports below the BA Fans (20' circumference) so there's something to hang the tents from.
George L. Church, Jr., CET Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc. PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842 877-324-ROWE 570-837-6335 fax g...@rowesprinkler.com -----Original Message----- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Tom Duross Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 7:25 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Wet tents drying at 45' Open floor plan? -----Original Message----- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George Church Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 3:21 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Wet tents drying at 45' Ok. 2007 #13, steel joist noncombustible construction, and qualify someone has BA Fan interlock off WFS. Glc Sent from my iPhone On Dec 31, 2012, at 3:17 PM, "George Church" <g...@rowesprinkler.com> wrote: > Here's an unusual one. Tent rental firm, they have a 45' high bay with > BA Fans and floor heat and a couple Unit heaters. They hoist them with wires and spread them out. Separate high piled rack storage outside this area, so fuel load is just what is hanging. Fire resistant canvass primarily, plus the fun of the window panels being a non expanded plastic. > Any ideas? > Glc > Rowe Sprinkler > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 28, 2012, at 10:15 PM, "Ron Greenman" <rongreen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, a flow switch is hardly an alarm check valve. if it will deform >> in forward flow it will deform in backward flow. It canot therefore >> be a check or one-way valve as it can't "check" flow in either direction. >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo < >> prodesigngr...@msn.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Dude! Show him the pictures in Figure A.8.16.1.1 (2007 edition, >>> similar in >>> 2010) It shows above the Alarm Check and the control valve. But then >>> it also shows BELOW the Alarm Check and BELOW the DPV on a manifold. >>> You show it "AFTER" a check and "Under" the Alarm valve "just like >>> the pictures in NFPA 13"!!!! Congrats, you win. >>> >>> It should be recognized that the above is my opinion as a member of >>> the NFPA, and has not been processed as a formal interpretation in >>> accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects >>> and should therefore not be considered, nor relied upon, as the >>> official position of the the NFPA, nor any of their technical committees. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> >>> Cecil Bilbo >>> Academy of Fire Sprinkler Technology Champaign, IL >>> 217.607.0325 >>> www.sprinkleracademy.com >>> >>> ce...@sprinkleracademy.com >>> >>> >>> >>> OUR STUDENTS SAVE LIVES!! >>> >>> >>>> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:57:21 -0500 >>>> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >>>> From: t...@fpdc.com >>>> Subject: RE: FDC location with riser manifold >>>> >>>> That has basically been my argument. However, how do I convince him >>>> that >>> a riser manifold is not an alarm valve? >>>> >>>> >>>> At 12:59 PM 12/28/2012, you wrote: >>>>> 2013 edition >>>>> 8.16.1.1.3.2 A listed backflow prevention device shall be considered >>> a check valve, and an additional check valve shall not be required. >>>>> >>>>> Your FDC is on the system side of the backflow/check valve. >>>>> >>>>> Duane Johnson, PE >>>>> Program Manager >>>>> Division of the Fire Marshal (Contractor) Office of Research >>>>> Services National Institutes of Health >>>>> 301-496-0487 >>>>> >>>>> "Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Todd Williams [mailto:t...@fpdc.com] >>>>> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 12:32 PM >>>>> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >>>>> Subject: FDC location with riser manifold >>>>> >>>>> I had an AHJ come back with a comment regarding a location of an >>>>> FDC on >>> a system I designed. The system has a single riser. The water main >>> comes into the building approximately 1'-6" AFF. An elbow is >>> installed and the backflow preventer is running horizontally >>> parallel to the outside wall. >>> The main turns vertical after the BFP and rises up at a riser >>> manifold (not >>> check) and on to the system. After the BFP, I called for a Tee with >>> one outlet looking up and the other horizontal to the check and FDC. >>> For design reasons, this has a significant advantage. The AHJ's >>> contention is that the BFP needs to be taken off above the manifold >>> because "that is what is says in NFPA 13". Section 8.16.2.4.2 (1) >>> states it shall be installed "on the system side of the system >>> control, check and alarm valves." His contention is that it says a >>> riser manifold is an alarm valve, which requires the FDC to be taken >>> off above. My contention is that since it is not a check valve, then >>> it doesn't make a d >>>> i >>>>> fference if it is above or below. The AHJ is an NFPA 13 >>> fundamentalist and if it is not in there, it isn't the truth. Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Todd G. Williams, PE >>>>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting >>>>> Stonington, CT >>>>> 860.535.2080 >>>>> www.fpdc.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>>>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >>>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>>>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >>>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >>>> >>>> Todd G. Williams, PE >>>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting >>>> Stonington, CT >>>> 860.535.2080 >>>> www.fpdc.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was >>> scrubbed... >>> URL: < >>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/att >>> achments/20121228/9e009fd0/attachment.html >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> >> >> >> -- >> Ron Greenman >> Instructor >> Fire Protection Engineering Technology Bates Technical College >> 1101 So. Yakima Ave. >> Tacoma, WA 98405 >> >> rgreen...@bates.ctc.edu >> >> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/ >> >> 253.680.7346 >> 253.576.9700 (cell) >> >> Member: >> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC >> >> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis >> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626) >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was >> scrubbed... >> URL: >> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/att >> achments/20121228/8e0b970a/attachment.html> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
