If there's a question cal. It both ways. Most demanding wins. Rinse and repeat design if the more demanding doesn't jive with the supply. Call it a day and hit the bars if you're good.
Sent from my iPhone On May 8, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Ralphy Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, NFPA 13 quoted at bottom w/ the relevant code section: > > With the 15 ft. extending into the lesser hazard is the intention to make > this extended area part of the hydraulic design area (to be included in > calcs) or simply to extend the results of the calculations into this area? My > impression is the latter but I would like to see if people concur with that. > > Thanks, > RB > > > > > > NFPA 13: 2007 > > 11.1.2 > > (1) Where areas are not physically separated by a barrier or partition > capable of delaying heat from a fire in one area from fusing sprinklers in > the adjacent area, the required sprinkler protection for the more demanding > design basis shall extend 15 ft (4.6 m) beyond its perimeter. > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
