Isn’t it suppose to be if you stamp it, you own it. Granted they think saying meet all codes and standards exempts them from oversights (like calling the entire school Light Hazard despite it having a working aircraft hangar as part of the facility) and it’s often easier to fix than fight but until they consistently get kicked in the ….. lets go with wallet, it isn’t going to change. Just like in the parking lot of most stores, where it says not responsible for damage caused by carts. If accepted, it's true.
Roland Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:20 PM, Todd Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > First of all there has to be an EoR in the first place. Today you get a lot > of stuff that is design-build because no one wants to take responsibility. > The project ends up being "specified" by the estimator when he figures the > job and the it is designed by a Nicet designer. If the designer does not have > a state license, then the former septic system engineer-turned baptist > minister (actual case here in CT) stamps it. So who is ultimately > responsible? > > Todd G Williams, PE > Fire Protection Design/Consulting > Stonington, CT > 860-535-2080 > www.fpdc.com > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
