No, there are 4 criteria to meet, and temp is not one.

> On Apr 19, 2014, at 3:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Does the use of a 200deg Q.R. sprinkler negate the Design Area Reduction for 
> the remote area?
> I am calculating an unused attic of a school trailer approximately 2'-6" 
> deep. Heads above & below with the greater number of sprinklers in the attic 
> area.
> 
> Mike B
> Aero Fire
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to