30" deep may require the use of specially listed concealed space sprinklers if it is a roof with slope of less than 2:12.
But to your original question, temp does not negate the use of the qr reduction. Travis Mack, SET MFP Design, LLC Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2014, at 1:53 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Brad, > > That was my thought also. > > > Mike Bell > Senior Designer, S.E.T. Lvl IV > Aero Automatic Sprinkler Company > 21605 N Central Ave > Phoenix AZ 85024 > PH: (623) 580-7848 > FX: (623) 580-5230 > Mobile: (623) 229-4980 > [email protected] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad > Casterline > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 1:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Intermediate Q.R. Sprinklers > > No, there are 4 criteria to meet, and temp is not one. > >> On Apr 19, 2014, at 3:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Does the use of a 200deg Q.R. sprinkler negate the Design Area Reduction for >> the remote area? >> I am calculating an unused attic of a school trailer approximately 2'-6" >> deep. Heads above & below with the greater number of sprinklers in the attic >> area. >> >> Mike B >> Aero Fire >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
