It sure would be nice if the book said something like "for 30" tall attics, 
stub some dry uprights up in there at about 10x10 spacing, at about 15" 
deflector, and tell the concealed space Marketeers to have a nice day :)

> On Apr 19, 2014, at 4:14 PM, Travis Mack <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 30" deep may require the use of specially listed concealed space sprinklers 
> if it is a roof with slope of less than 2:12. 
> 
> But to your original question, temp does not negate the use of the qr 
> reduction.  
> 
> Travis Mack, SET
> MFP Design, LLC
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Apr 19, 2014, at 1:53 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Brad,
>> 
>> That was my thought also.
>> 
>> 
>> Mike Bell
>> Senior Designer, S.E.T. Lvl IV
>> Aero Automatic Sprinkler Company
>> 21605 N Central Ave
>> Phoenix AZ 85024
>> PH: (623) 580-7848
>> FX: (623) 580-5230
>> Mobile: (623) 229-4980
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad 
>> Casterline
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 1:47 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Intermediate Q.R. Sprinklers
>> 
>> No, there are 4 criteria to meet, and temp is not one.
>> 
>>> On Apr 19, 2014, at 3:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Does the use of a 200deg Q.R. sprinkler negate the Design Area Reduction 
>>> for the remote area?
>>> I am calculating an unused attic of a school trailer approximately 2'-6" 
>>> deep. Heads above & below with the greater number of sprinklers in the 
>>> attic area.
>>> 
>>> Mike B
>>> Aero Fire
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to