your cue Ed... talk to us...

> On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:12 AM, "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Craig,
> 
> Ed Vining has a good story about deluge and pre-action systems and how
> contractors leap for dollars where wiser men fear to tread.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Craig, when I first read this post I thought "HUH, PREACTION WAREHOUSE?"
>> No experience with that. I think the details of a combined DRY and
>> PREACTION system are still in 13. Maybe ~25 years ago that is what this
>> was, when computers cost 20k.
>> 
>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I guess you could start a fire, and follow the sequence of events,
>> taking measurements on this and that here and there.
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:26 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I have provided all of the information that I have.  The functionality
>> of the system as a whole is questionable.  Without contractor shop drawings
>> there is no way to surmise the type of system or how it was actually
>> designed other than by what you can physically see.   There is a list of
>> "why did they do that", "how did they come up with that number" and other
>> various design and installation questions that just don't make good sense.
>>>> 
>>>> So thanks for all the input but that's about all we've got.
>>>> 
>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Mike Cabral <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Supervisory air is a necessary component for single interlock. No
>> supervisory air and it's not even a dry pipe system. We are not getting
>> required information regarding this installation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This might be a Supertex system using HAD's. From what I recall from
>> the thread there was no releasing panel or no access to the panel very
>> strange, now no supervisory air? What's the compressor for?
>>>>> 
>>>>> A photo of the riser would be helpful.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mike
>>>>> 
>>>>> Happy Holliday
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 3, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Kenneth Berman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If there's no pneumatic supervision of piping, and there's been no
>>>>>> mention of a pilot line, it sounds like a single interlock.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:32 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> OK, there we are.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> One other thing I just discovered,  there is no pneumatic
>>>>>>> supervision of the piping.  The only air compressor served a dry
>> standpipe system.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>>>>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>>>>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>>>>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> Johnson, Duane (NIH/OD/ORS) [C]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:13 AM
>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1999 has 30% increase for dry and preaction systems protecting rack
>>>>>>> storage 7-4.1.5.2 and 7-4.1.5.3. There is a bar next to the
>> paragraphs.
>>>>>>> There is also an exception that says the requirement does not apply
>>>>>>> to preaction systems where it can be demonstrated that the detection
>>>>>>> system activates the system as quickly as a wet pipe system. Sounds
>>>>>>> like the beginning of a new requirement...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Duane Johnson, PE
>>>>>>> Program Manager
>>>>>>> Division of the Fire Marshal (Contractor) Office of Research
>>>>>>> Services National Institutes of Health
>>>>>>> 301-496-0487
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:07 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's what I'm trying to track down.  When did that provision go
>> away?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I know today's requirements, just need verification of design
>>>>>>> requirements or allowances in 1982.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have a copy of NFPA 231 from 1978 but it doesn't address NFPA 13
>>>>>>> issues nor speak of preaction systems.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>>>>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>>>>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>>>>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John
>>>>>>> Denhardt
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:56 AM
>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There is no increase in remote area on single interlocked back in
>> the day.
>>>>>>> Several editions ago (??) that was deleted for storage.  Now there
>>>>>>> is a 30% increase in remote area for all pre-action systems in
>> storage.
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> John August Denhardt, P.E., FSFPE
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Strickland Fire Protection Incorporated
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 5113 Berwyn Road
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> College Park, Maryland 20740
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Office Telephone Number:  301-474-1136
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mobile Telephone Number:  301-343-1457
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> FIRE SPRINKLERS SAVE LIVES - Can you live without them?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:55 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for all the input.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't have access to the releasing panel.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The hydraulic placard gives no indication of the system type.
>>>>>>> Design data is 0.26/4000 but that lines up exactly with the 1978
>>>>>>> NFPA 231 for Class IV commodities so no real help there.  It doesn't
>>>>>>> appear they provided for the 30% increase for dry system.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I thought I had seen at some point in time within NFPA 13 that one
>>>>>>> of the preaction system types (I believe it was single interlock)
>>>>>>> were considered the same as wet due to water filling pipes before
>>>>>>> sprinkler operation and therefore did not require the 30% increase
>>>>>>> in design area.  I can't seem to find that verbiage in past or
>>>>>>> present NFPA 13 Standards now that I'm looking for it.  Any clues or
>> was I mislead?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have Engineer's drawings from 1982, no contractor shop drawings or
>>>>>>> calculations.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are no data sheets.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are no test reports.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, I love impossible
>>>>>>> challenges.......................................to
>>>>>>> a point.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Izzo,
>>>>>>> Salvatore
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:25 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If the warehouse is unheated, that is, if there is a chance of
>>>>>>> freezing, it is my opinion that it would be doubtfulto find a single
>>>>>>> interlock preaction system; therefore, it would likely be a double
>>>>>>> interlock.  You could look at the design area on the hydraulic
>>>>>>> placard ( if there is one) as one way of making the determination.
>>>>>>> Take a look at the trim, and if you do not see a pneumatic actuator
>>>>>>> in addition to the solenoid, it is likely that it is an
>>>>>>> electric-electric type double interlock system.  This can be
>>>>>>> verified by looking at the releasing panel input zones and
>>>>>>> determining if the low air pressure switch is wired into an alarm
>>>>>>> zone rather than a low air supervisory zone. Of course, you can
>> verify the manufacturer and compare to the data sheets as well.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Salvatore J. Izzo III, P.E.  SFPE
>>>>>>> Manager - QA/QC Operations
>>>>>>> Insurance Services Office
>>>>>>> Verisk Commercial Real Estate
>>>>>>> 545 Washington Blvd.
>>>>>>> Jersey City, NJ 07310 - 1686
>>>>>>> t 201.469.2486
>>>>>>> f 201.748.1942
>>>>>>> c 732.533.7927
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> www.verisk.com/insurance
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Verisk Insurance Solutions ● ISO | AIR Worldwide | Xactware
>>>>>>> -----Original
>>>>>>> Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:13 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ok, So what would be the tell-tale difference?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> Johnson, Duane (NIH/OD/ORS) [C]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:12 AM
>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nope. You have to look at the trim on the preaction valve.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Duane Johnson, PE
>>>>>>> Program Manager
>>>>>>> Division of the Fire Marshal (Contractor) Office of Research
>>>>>>> Services National Institutes of Health
>>>>>>> 301-496-0487
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:09 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Can you identify the type of preaction system installed just by
>>>>>>> looking at the system riser?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have a warehouse, unheated, Preaction system of unknown type.
>>>>>>> There are heat detectors at the roof deck and there is a small air
>> compressor.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's all I've got to go on.  I can make assumptions all day long,
>>>>>>> but no assumption is better than an incorrect assumption at this
>> point.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
>>>>>>> kler.org _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
>>>>>>> kler.org _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
>>>>>>> kler.org _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
>>>>>>> kler.org _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
>>>>>>> kler.org
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprink
>>>>>> ler.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>>>>> er.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering Technology
> Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA 98405
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
> 
> 253.680.7346
> 253.576.9700 (cell)
> 
> Member:
> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC
> 
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
> essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> 
> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
> inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to