Search 'Ed vining deluge' Craig, you'll get there. 
Very funny stuff!

> On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> There's nothing at the link.
> 
> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29303
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Brad Casterline
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 12:02 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Identification of preaction system types
> 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+Gridded+pre%26%2345%3Baction+and+dry%22
> 
> Well I got impatient so I searched the archives for Ed vining deluge
> 
>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> your cue Ed... talk to us...
>> 
>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:12 AM, "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Craig,
>>> 
>>> Ed Vining has a good story about deluge and pre-action systems and 
>>> how contractors leap for dollars where wiser men fear to tread.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Brad Casterline 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Craig, when I first read this post I thought "HUH, PREACTION WAREHOUSE?"
>>>> No experience with that. I think the details of a combined DRY and 
>>>> PREACTION system are still in 13. Maybe ~25 years ago that is what 
>>>> this was, when computers cost 20k.
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Brad Casterline 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I guess you could start a fire, and follow the sequence of events,
>>>> taking measurements on this and that here and there.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:26 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have provided all of the information that I have.  The 
>>>>>> functionality
>>>> of the system as a whole is questionable.  Without contractor shop 
>>>> drawings there is no way to surmise the type of system or how it was 
>>>> actually
>>>> designed other than by what you can physically see.   There is a list of
>>>> "why did they do that", "how did they come up with that number" and 
>>>> other various design and installation questions that just don't make good 
>>>> sense.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So thanks for all the input but that's about all we've got.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>>>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>>>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>>>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Mike Cabral 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Supervisory air is a necessary component for single interlock. No
>>>> supervisory air and it's not even a dry pipe system. We are not 
>>>> getting required information regarding this installation.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This might be a Supertex system using HAD's. From what I recall 
>>>>>>> from
>>>> the thread there was no releasing panel or no access to the panel 
>>>> very strange, now no supervisory air? What's the compressor for?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A photo of the riser would be helpful.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Happy Holliday
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jul 3, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Kenneth Berman 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If there's no pneumatic supervision of piping, and there's been 
>>>>>>>> no mention of a pilot line, it sounds like a single interlock.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:32 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> OK, there we are.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> One other thing I just discovered,  there is no pneumatic 
>>>>>>>>> supervision of the piping.  The only air compressor served a 
>>>>>>>>> dry
>>>> standpipe system.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>>>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>>>>>>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>>>>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>>>>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>>>>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>>>>>>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>>>>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>>>>>>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>>>>> Johnson, Duane (NIH/OD/ORS) [C]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:13 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1999 has 30% increase for dry and preaction systems protecting 
>>>>>>>>> rack storage 7-4.1.5.2 and 7-4.1.5.3. There is a bar next to 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> paragraphs.
>>>>>>>>> There is also an exception that says the requirement does not 
>>>>>>>>> apply to preaction systems where it can be demonstrated that 
>>>>>>>>> the detection system activates the system as quickly as a wet 
>>>>>>>>> pipe system. Sounds like the beginning of a new requirement...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Duane Johnson, PE
>>>>>>>>> Program Manager
>>>>>>>>> Division of the Fire Marshal (Contractor) Office of Research 
>>>>>>>>> Services National Institutes of Health
>>>>>>>>> 301-496-0487
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> "Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time"
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:07 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That's what I'm trying to track down.  When did that provision 
>>>>>>>>> go
>>>> away?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I know today's requirements, just need verification of design 
>>>>>>>>> requirements or allowances in 1982.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have a copy of NFPA 231 from 1978 but it doesn't address NFPA 
>>>>>>>>> 13 issues nor speak of preaction systems.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>>>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>>>>>>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>>>>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>>>>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>>>>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>>>>>>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>>>>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>>>>>>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>>>>> John Denhardt
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:56 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There is no increase in remote area on single interlocked back 
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>> the day.
>>>>>>>>> Several editions ago (??) that was deleted for storage.  Now 
>>>>>>>>> there is a 30% increase in remote area for all pre-action 
>>>>>>>>> systems in
>>>> storage.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> John August Denhardt, P.E., FSFPE
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Strickland Fire Protection Incorporated
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 5113 Berwyn Road
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> College Park, Maryland 20740
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Office Telephone Number:  301-474-1136
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Mobile Telephone Number:  301-343-1457
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> FIRE SPRINKLERS SAVE LIVES - Can you live without them?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:55 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the input.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I don't have access to the releasing panel.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The hydraulic placard gives no indication of the system type.
>>>>>>>>> Design data is 0.26/4000 but that lines up exactly with the 
>>>>>>>>> 1978 NFPA 231 for Class IV commodities so no real help there.  
>>>>>>>>> It doesn't appear they provided for the 30% increase for dry system.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I thought I had seen at some point in time within NFPA 13 that 
>>>>>>>>> one of the preaction system types (I believe it was single 
>>>>>>>>> interlock) were considered the same as wet due to water filling 
>>>>>>>>> pipes before sprinkler operation and therefore did not require 
>>>>>>>>> the 30% increase in design area.  I can't seem to find that 
>>>>>>>>> verbiage in past or present NFPA 13 Standards now that I'm 
>>>>>>>>> looking for it.  Any clues or
>>>> was I mislead?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have Engineer's drawings from 1982, no contractor shop 
>>>>>>>>> drawings or calculations.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There are no data sheets.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There are no test reports.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I love impossible
>>>>>>>>> challenges.......................................to
>>>>>>>>> a point.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>>>>> Izzo, Salvatore
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:25 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If the warehouse is unheated, that is, if there is a chance of 
>>>>>>>>> freezing, it is my opinion that it would be doubtfulto find a 
>>>>>>>>> single interlock preaction system; therefore, it would likely 
>>>>>>>>> be a double interlock.  You could look at the design area on 
>>>>>>>>> the hydraulic placard ( if there is one) as one way of making the 
>>>>>>>>> determination.
>>>>>>>>> Take a look at the trim, and if you do not see a pneumatic 
>>>>>>>>> actuator in addition to the solenoid, it is likely that it is 
>>>>>>>>> an electric-electric type double interlock system.  This can be 
>>>>>>>>> verified by looking at the releasing panel input zones and 
>>>>>>>>> determining if the low air pressure switch is wired into an 
>>>>>>>>> alarm zone rather than a low air supervisory zone. Of course, 
>>>>>>>>> you can
>>>> verify the manufacturer and compare to the data sheets as well.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Salvatore J. Izzo III, P.E.  SFPE Manager - QA/QC Operations 
>>>>>>>>> Insurance Services Office Verisk Commercial Real Estate
>>>>>>>>> 545 Washington Blvd.
>>>>>>>>> Jersey City, NJ 07310 - 1686
>>>>>>>>> t 201.469.2486
>>>>>>>>> f 201.748.1942
>>>>>>>>> c 732.533.7927
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> www.verisk.com/insurance
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Verisk Insurance Solutions ● ISO | AIR Worldwide | Xactware 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original
>>>>>>>>> Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:13 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ok, So what would be the tell-tale difference?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Craig L. Prahl
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>>>>> Johnson, Duane (NIH/OD/ORS) [C]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:12 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Identification of preaction system types
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Nope. You have to look at the trim on the preaction valve.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Duane Johnson, PE
>>>>>>>>> Program Manager
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to