Exactly, Steve. To others on the forum, this is why knowledge of building code 
requirements can be so vital to what you do. Given the concept of "distance to 
a property line" either real or imagined, buildings usually need to be set-back 
10 feet. So two buildings with an imaginary property line between them would 
need to be 20 feet apart; but the building code allows variations to that rule 
depending on a variety of conditions. The architect and the AHJ knows what 
conditions are involved to achieve a compliant building. Simply not being 
connected to each other does not constitute separate buildings.

If the building plans have been approved you can generally find all the 
required information you need on the plans; but if you're being called in to 
bid on a building before the plans are approved, well ... I wouldn't want to be 
in that situation without a good report with the architect and AHJ.

Galen Taylor
County of Los Angeles Fire Department
Fire Prevention Engineering
323-890-4339
[email protected]

"Ensuring Public Safety Through the Built Environment"


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Porte Cochere

Don't run too hard or fast with that number though; very subjective.
Here in CA our state AHJ's use 20'.

Steve L.
Back on Topic

 




-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John 
Denhardt
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:49 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Porte Cochere

Usually 10' is thrown around as minimum separation otherwise it is considered 
one building.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark A. 
Sornsin, P.E.
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Porte Cochere

Without researching this, I believe from experience that it is considered a 
separate building.  However, the close proximity may bring into play other code 
issues - such as having an unsprinklered structure too close to unprotected 
building openings

Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection Engineer | 
Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 | 
http://www.kfiengineers.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Silva
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Porte Cochere

A building is designed to NFPA 13R. However, the local building code requires 
the sprinklering of "porches and balconies" notwithstanding the 13R permission 
for deletion. So say it is a 13 building. This building has a portico or porte 
cochere near the main entrance of the building, which is not attached to the 
building. I don't know the exact clearance between the two structures, but for 
argument sake, say they are 3 feet apart. The contractor claims the portico is 
not attached to the building, so doesn't need to be sprinklered. Any views from 
the forum?

Tony
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
.org

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to