Then typically unless you have a written variation approval (citing the code requirement, why compliance could not be achieved, and what equivalent measures where taken) a code violation exists. Aside from all that the only sleepless nights will occur when another code Official cites it years later or when you get to visit a room that resembles a church but isn't but you still swear to god.
John Drucker - Mobile Email Asst Construction Official Fire Protection Subcode Official [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cell/Text 732-904-6823 [email protected] wrote: Yes Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 31, 2015, at 6:14 PM, John Drucker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are the valves required to be electrically supervised by applicable code ? > > John Drucker - Mobile Email > Asst Construction Official > Fire Protection Subcode Official > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Cell/Text 732-904-6823 > > > [email protected] wrote: > > What say you? > An inspector failed to require tamper switches on control valves. The job is > complete and there are thousands of pounds of concrete between the control > valves and the electrical panel. They placed a chain and lock and the chief > declared the chain and lock meet intent...final approved. What say you? > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
