Hello Craig,

IF there is a ceiling with space above. This actually this would be a good 
application for Aspirating Smoke Detection. All you would have on the ceiling 
is a small round circle.

Monday, March 7, 2016, 8:26:55 AM, you wrote:

> I had one where the saw tooth roof system was used, it was actually
> baffles for sound but sprinklers and lines were run behind them.

> The other option which may or may not work is to invoke the
> Sprinkler Exemption section out of the IBC.  As much as we like to
> see buildings fully protected, there are cases where is impractical
> or at times creates a much greater hazard than a fire would.  (yes
> I've had a project where a fire in the building caused less monetary
> damage than sprinkler discharge on the process equipment)

> So If you apply Exemptions (2) and (4) out of IBC 903.3.1.1.1 (using the 2012 
> edition here)

> IBC 2012 903.3.1.1.1 Exempt locations. Automatic sprinklers shall
> not be required in the following rooms or areas where such rooms or
> areas are protected with an approved automatic fire detection system
> in accordance with Section 907.2 that will respond to visible or
> invisible particles of combustion. Sprinklers shall not be omitted
> from any room merely because it is damp, of fire-resistance-rated
> construction or contains electrical equipment.

> 2. Any room or space where sprinklers are considered undesirable
> because of the nature of the contents, when approved by the fire code 
> official.

> 4. Rooms or areas that are of noncombustible construction with wholly 
> noncombustible contents.

> Now of course there is a trade out of smoke detection for
> sprinklers which in a gun range isn't going to work either.  There
> is no real justification for sprinklers in the range areas, maybe at
> the trap end and maybe at the staging end but down the lanes, there is none.

> But if the AHJ insists on sprinklers then the owner or GC needs to
> provide some means of protecting the piping and the sprinklers
> otherwise SIPA or DIPA with dry pilot heads not smoke detection for
> the trigger is probably going to be the only viable choice.  

> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29303
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
> [email protected]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael 
> Hill
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Shooting Range

> I have put sprinklers in several shooting ranges (Government made me do it).
> They were all double interlock preaction systems with piping run
> above the steel roof/ceiling of the range. They all used concealed type 
> sprinklers.
> One of the ranges utilized a saw tooth ceiling/roof to protect the heads.
> Two of the systems have been hit and put into trouble (including
> the saw tooth one - hit by a ricochet). Luckily no water has been
> released. I know one system that has been hit several times and the
> building has turned the system off.

> Mike Hill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Jay Stough
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:43 PM
> To: Sprinkler Forum <[email protected]>
> Subject: Shooting Range

> I am looking for guidance on designing sprinklers in a shooting range.
> Something about little glass bulbs or solder links in an area that
> has high velocity projectiles, seems not right.  Everything in each
> alley (including the separation walls) are non-combustible.  The
> only thing combustible at the end of the range is shredded rubber
> used to absorb the impact after the target.  The rubber is treated
> with flame retardant and replaced every three months.  Each alley
> has a series of baffles below the roof that are at a 45 degree angle
> for sound.  The designer of the facility has done many of these
> without sprinklers in this area of the building.  He has even shot
> tracers to see how the flame retardant hold up and the flame goes out is less 
> than
> 20 seconds.  A fire marshal is saying to sprinkler everything.
>   If you have any insight, I am listening closely.

> *Jay Stough*
> NICET IV LAYOUT
> NICET III ITM
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org



-- 
Best regards,
 Charles                            mailto:[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to