Ryan,

Unfortunately, NFPA realized that this was too good of a deal for code
access, so they now force you to use their ebook app and pay book-level
prices for this...

I still access my NFPA 13 2010 app all the time, but its quickly becoming
too far out of date for me.


Benjamin Young

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Ryan Labrie <
[email protected]> wrote:

> NFPA also has mobile apps available, I purchased  13-2010 for $10 on my
> iPhone. I prefer the app over searching the PDF because any table or other
> section is linked when referenced. Their selection of single code books is
> limited but they also have an eLibrary app that can access any ebook you
> have purchased on your NFPA account.
>
>
>
> *Ryan Labrie*
>
> Fire Protection Designer
>
>
>
>
> *Critical System Solutions, LLC*2830 Scherer Drive, Suite 300
> St. Petersburg, FL  33716
> Office: 727.209.5122
>
> Fax:      727.209.5126
>
> Cell:     813.394.3978
>
> Email:  [email protected]
>
>
>
> [image: CSS Logo]
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org] *On Behalf Of *Travis Mack
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:48 AM
> *To:* Charles Thurston; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Cloud computing for NFPA standards
>
>
>
> Set up a Dropbox account. Put the PDF copies of standards on your Dropbox.
> Then I can access copies of standards right in a meeting or anytime.
>
>
>
> It has served me well over the years.
>
>
>
> As an outside design firm, embracing cloud computing via the full versions
> of Dropbox has been a game changer.
>
>
>
> Travis Mack, SET
>
> MFP Design, LLC
>
> "Follow" us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-
> LLC/92218417692
>
> Send large files to MFP Design via:
>
> https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Charles Thurston <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> I have hard copy for my main uses, Carry the PDFs on a thumb drive with me
> so if I really need to find something while I am out, Any computer will let
> me.
>
> Tuesday, September 27, 2016, 9:41:02 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm still stubbornly analog and prefer to use the traditional hard copy.
> This is a pretty good reason to take the PDF for a test drive I suppose.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
>
> From: Charles Thurston <[email protected]>
>
> Date: 9/27/16 5:58 AM (GMT-08:00)
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: Question for any member of Installation Sub-TC
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello Tom,
>
>
>
> I just did a search in the PDF for "Floor Control Valve Assemblies" I came
> up in 8.4.2 as the only location on the whole phrase.
>
>
>
> Then a search on "Floor Control Valve" came up with :
>
> 8.16.1.1.2.2 Floor control valves in high-rise buildings and
>
> valves controlling flow to sprinklers in circulating closed loop
>
> systems shall comply with 8.16.1.1.2.1(1) or 8.16.1.1.2.1(2).
>
>
>
> Tuesday, September 27, 2016, 7:53:21 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 4:36 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> That’s my question – has it been rescinded?   Didn’t see it anywhere else
> in the standard but figured it was worth a question …
>
>
>
> SL
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org <[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Joe
> Burtell
>
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:31 PM
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: Question for any member of Installation Sub-TC
>
>
>
> 2016
>
>
>
> 8.16.1.5* In-Rack Sprinkler System Control Valves.
>
> A.8.16.1.5 In-rack sprinklers and ceiling sprinklers selected for
> protection should be con-
>
> trolled by at least two separate indicating valves and drains. In higher
> rack arrangements,
>
> consideration should be given to providing more than one in-rack control
> valve in order to
>
> limit the extent of any single impairment.
>
>
>
> I would say, yes or it moved?
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Joe Burtell, SET, CFPS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <image001.jpg>
>
>
>
> PH: 406-652-7697
>
>
>
> Fax: 406-652-7743 | Cell: 406-861-4507
>
>
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
>
> Web Site: http://www.burtellfire.com
>
>
>
> NOTICE:  The information contained in this e-mail transmission is intended
> only for use of the individual or entity named above.  This e-mail
> transmission, and any documents, files, previous e-mail transmissions or
> other information attached to it, may contain  confidential information
> that is legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail transmission, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it
> to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> dissemination,  distribution, copying or other use of this transmission or
> any of the information contained in or attached to this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
> immediately notify us by return e-mail transmission  and destroy the
> original e-mail transmission as well as its attachments without reading or
> saving it in any manner.  Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Was 8.16.1.5 Floor Control Valve Assemblies (13, 2013 edition) completely
> rescinded in 2016 edition?
>
>
>
> <image002.png>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
>
>  Charles                            mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Charles                            mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to