Beats me John.
perhaps after Steve is finished helping his wife hang the new drapes he can
enlighten us all.

All I know is I finally found the info I was most concerned about last
Tuesday -- most of the autopsies were done and the cause of death was smoke
inhalation (trapped on the second floor) -- a final small mercy as opposed
to being burned alive-- not that I have experienced either one-- I'm just
saying-- talking about killer smoke.
On Dec 11, 2016 1:17 PM, "John Drucker" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Brad, when the PV solar panel thing was going round and round I asked a
> simple question, what's the issue. Venting, the removal of heat and fire
> gases of course. So the solar panels are in the way, yes they are. So let's
> solve the problem, a) sprinkler the building so we wouldn't need to vent
> heat and fire gases, or b) provide a permanent method of
> ventilation...choose a solution.  Making it more difficult and hazardous to
> the fire department is not the answer.
>
> PS, how about an added incentive if you choose a) a property tax credit
> since you wouldnt be needing too much from the fire department, and lower
> premiums from your insurance company. As for the property tax issue,
> municipalities should be rewarding those that invest in safety, and
> surcharge those that dont.
>
>
>
> John Drucker
> Assistant Construction Official
> Fire Protection Subcode Official
> Electrical Subcode Official
> [email protected]
> Cell/Text 732-904-6823 <(732)%20904-6823>
>
>
> Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Of course! (I didn't notice any, butt...)
>
> If I was put in charge of a 'life safety moon-shot temporary measure
> regarding converted warehouse only to live-work environments to prevent the
> next Ghostship catastrophe' it would not be anything anyone has mentiond
> yet- it would be cutting in rooftop smoke exhast fans.
> On Dec 11, 2016 12:03 PM, "John Drucker" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Welcome, please excuse the grammatical errors.
>>
>> John Drucker.
>>
>>
>> Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your fair and balanced take on this John.
>> Up until about four years ago I was a 'Pure Sprink', meaning when I first
>> heard that Mr. Shirmer's testimony was that sprinklers would not have saved
>> those lives I exclaimed, "that's ridiculous", even though that was the only
>> thing I knew about it.
>> But about half-way through several hundred hours of effort over the next
>> two years I lost my sprinkler cheerleader virginity, but only to the point
>> that I can stand behind my statements such as "...sprinklers alone...", and
>> ..."can't do it all..."
>> There is no doubt in my mind that the phenomenal success story of
>> properly installed and maintained fire sprinkler systems is buoyed up by
>> the fact that where we find those we probably find the other components of
>> overall life safety, like number and width of exits, travel distances---
>> the technical aspects you mention.
>>
>> And Mr. Leyton,
>> When I read your story about Chet's biggest regret I thought it is
>> possible he regretted having testified at all, not what he testified to.
>> That took some balls for a man in his position at the time.
>>
>> Brad
>> On Dec 10, 2016 5:51 AM, "John Drucker" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Members,
>>>
>>> The Ghost Ship Fire situation appears to taking on the characteristics
>>> of most other civilian fire death fires. On the technical side, lack of
>>> means of egress, fire rated construction, active fire protection. On the
>>> administrative side, illegal use, inadequate oversight and inspection, a
>>> sympathetic culture towards the socioeconomic plight of starving artists.
>>>
>>> Based on the interviews appears as though city councilmembers knew it
>>> was there and dangerous. And so the stage was set. It was just matter if
>>> time before the "Ghost Ship" and it's name would join the Beverly Hills
>>> Supper Club, Coconut Grove, Iroquois Theatre, Station Night Club, Beachview
>>> Nursing Home, Epitome, and on and on.
>>>
>>> As with all the other loss of life incidents the common elements are the
>>> same eventually come into alignment and the uncontrolled chain reaction
>>> takes place. In the end the remaining common element will take its place,
>>> this too shall pass and the Ghost Ship will be forgotten by most.
>>>
>>> In closing its a matter of consensus, and like the residential fire
>>> sprinkler issue society appears to be willing to dispel the  science and
>>> take a wait and see approach. It is unnecessary to relearn what we already
>>> know. We have the knowledge on how to prevent and protect against fires. We
>>> will all back at this same juncture soon enough, it's not a matter of if
>>> but when.
>>>
>>> Happy Holidays all, keep the faith.
>>>
>>> John Drucker
>>> Assistant Construction Official
>>> Fire Protection Subcode Official
>>> Electrical Subcode Official
>>> [email protected]
>>> Cell/Text 732-904-6823
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-f
>>> iresprinkler.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-
>> firesprinkler.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to